THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [1]

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [1]





Our parish church was commenced in the late 13th century when a great fervour

of church building swept through Northamptonshire. It is thought by some that an

earlier church stood on the same sight. This 13th century building consisted of the

chancel, with the nave extending to only three bays, with both north and south aisles.



About 1320-1330 the nave was extended to its present length of 61ft.6”. The

north aisle was also extended, but the three bays of the south side remained as

original. Both north and south doorways are of the 13th century with the

characteristic edge rolls.



The tower followed later in the 14th century. The chapel at the east end of

the south aisle is of the 13th century, and now contains the table tomb of Roger Wake

and his wife Elizabeth Catesby. In the 15th century three large windows were inserted

in the chancel, but two of the 13th century small windows were left untouched. Both

of these are on the south side. The fine five light east window has tracery of

unusual type and this was in all probability added in the 14th century when the east

and north walls of the chancel were either rebuilt or refaced. There is also a

blocked north doorway in the chancel... often referred to as the “priest‟s doorway”.

It is not known when this was blocked. Also of great interest on the north and south

sides of the chancel are the blocked low side windows. (More about these in

subsequent jottings).









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [2]





Last month‟s historical notes were read by at least two people, both of whom

deserve mention for one of them is ninety years old and the other “coming up to

ninety”. The latter, Mrs Lee of Connegar Leys, says that she fully enjoyed the notes

and that she considers the re-telling of the history of our church an excellent idea.



From the ninety-year-old came a very welcome correction. Last month I stated

that the north “priest‟s door” had been blocked at an unknown date, but Mr. William

Whitlock informs us that he well remembers this door being open and in regular use.

The only people to officially use it were the rector and the members of his family. At

the time the chancel was furnished only with two ancient stalls (now used by the

choir-men) and it was in these that the rector‟s family sat... in fact they used the

chancel as a private pew. The choir sat in the belfry. With the installation of the

organ in 1889 the “priest‟s doorway” was blocked up, the boy‟s choir stalls were

erected, and the choir was moved up to the chancel, but the introduction of surplices

and cassocks followed many years later.



Having now made this correction, thanks to Mr. Whitlock, we will return to the

notes in sequence from last month‟s tour of the church.



The tower was added to the church at the end of the 14th century and the

official description is thus:-



The tower is of three stages divided by strings, with moulded plinth and pairs

of four-stage buttresses at its western angles, above which there are small diagonal

buttresses. In the bottom stage is a restored west window of two trefoiled lights,

but the north and south sides are blank. The middle stage has a small trefoiled

opening on each side, that on the north side covered by the clock dial, and the

pointed bell chamber windows are of two trefoiled lights with a quatrefoil in the

head. The tower terminates in a battlemented parapet without pinnacles.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [3]





Apart from providing homes for the many birds and bats, the chief object in

building the massive belfries was to house the varying number of bells. The first

recorded bell in England was at Whitby in the year 690. With the development of the

church buildings in size, so also the belfries became larger, incorporating a greater

number of bells.



The earliest mention of bells at Blisworth occurs in 1552 when there were

“Three greate belle and a Sanct. Bell”. There appears to have been a complete

overhaul of the bell frame and the bells in 1624, which date appears on one of the

massive oaken beams now supporting (rather precariously) the frame on which our

present five bells hang. At this time (1624) the second and the third bells were most

probably added, for both these bells are inscribed with the date 1624.



In 1626 the smallest bell was re-cast . . . and yet again in 1758. Number four

bell was recast in 1758, and number five bell (our largest, 42” in diam.) was re-cast

in 1663 and again in 1758. In 1700 it is recorded that there was a priest‟s bell

which carried the date 1635, but no mention of this bell appears at any later date.



In all probability the re-casting of the bells was done locally; many of the

bell founders constructed temporary casting shops in the churchyards, using charcoal

for the fuel. The roads were in such a bad condition they prohibited the cartage of

such heavy objects for any great distance.



All five bells in our tower carry interesting inscriptions which will be dealt

with in the News Sheet next month.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [4]





Since the early days the custom of inscribing the church bells seems to have

been fairly common, although the pre-reformation bells followed the simple name of a

saint or perhaps the name of the founder. These early inscriptions are usually in

stately gothic capital letters and in Latin – the language of the mediaeval church.

The reformation introduced many changes in connection with bells. The stately gothic

capitals gradually gave place to the clumsy roman letters for the inscriptions.

English, although it did not supplant Latin, gained a full share of use on the bells.

Old forms of inscriptions were dropped, at first to give place to mottos of a reverent

character, which soon however, drifted in many places into doggerel rhyme, stupid,

frivolous, and thoroughly out of place, or into a bare list of names of vicar and

churchwardens.



Our No.1 bell, with a diameter of thirty-one inches, carries the following

inscription:-



“TINNITVS RAPIDOS SCINT ILLANS SPARGO PER AVRAS”

THOS AEYRE ME FECIT. 1758



Bell No. 2, diameter thirty-two inches:-

BARTHOLOMEW ATTON ADE ME. 1624 RA.



Bell No. 3, diameter thirty six and a half inches:-

BARTHOLOMEW ATTON MADE ME RA 1624



Bell No 4,:-

“GOD SAVE OUR QVEEN AND PRESARVE HER PECE”

Henry Bagly M me 1713

Richard Barwell. John Burgess. Churchwardens.



Bell No. 5, diameter forty two and a half inches:-

VLTERA CVRETVM PLVASVS CORYBANTIAQVE AERA

Thos Eayre. Horologicvs.

William Plowman and William Herbert

Hierophy lacebvs A.D. 1758



The first and fifth bells were previously inscribed:-

1. R.A. Bartholomew Atton made me 1626.

5. George Bland and John Plowman churchwardens

Henry Bagly made me 1663.



The Priest‟s bell existing in 1700 was inscribed:-

God save the King 1635.



Bell No.1 was cast in the reign of George II, bells No‟s 2 and 3 were cast in the

reign of George II, bells No‟s 2 and 3 were cast in the reign of James I, and bell

No.4 was cast in the reign of Queen Anne.



Next month I will give you (from Pears dictionary) the translation of the Latin

inscriptions, together with notes of the bell founders, etc.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [5]





This month we will deal with the translations of the Latin inscriptions of

bells No‟s 1 and 5. Bell No. 1 has a simple translation which reads thus: “I

sparkling scatter through the air the rapid sounds.” Up to the beginning of the last

war, this No. 1 bell was rung daily at twelve noon and was commonly called the “dinner

bell”. Thanks to the sexton‟s good time keeping. This practice was very welcome in

the days before radio and time signals.



Bell No 5 carries a much more elaborate inscription and the straight

translation is as follows: “Beyond the applause of the Curetes, and the cymbals of

Corybantes.” And who were these people? Well my dictionary gives quite a lot about

them and I have condensed the description as well as possible.



“CURATES” – In Cretan mythology the Curetes were demi gods armed with weapons

of brass, to whom the new born child ZEUS was give for save keeping. They drowned his

cries by striking their spears against their shields.



“COREBANTES” – These fellows were the mythical attendants of the phrygian

goddess PREA CYBELLE, who were supposed to accompany the goddess with wild dances and

intoxicating music while she wandered by torchlight over the forest clad mountains.



Both bells No‟s 1 and 5 were cast by the same man and this possibly explains

the Latin wording which could well have been stock phrases suggested by the bell

founder whose name was Thomas Aeyre. Many of the bell founders were clockmakers and

this was the case with the Aeyre family who lived at Kettering. You will note that on

bell No. 5 Thos. Aeyre inscribes after his name HOROLOGICUS, or as we would say to-

day, a clockmaker.



It is interesting to note that as with the former No. 5 bell carrying the name

of John Plowman, churchwarden in 1626, so also is inscribed yet another member of the

ancient village family, William Plowman, churchwarden 1758, on the present No. 5 bell.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [6]





Last month we dealt with bells No. 1 and 5. This month we will review bells

No‟s 2, 3, and 4.

Bells 2 and 3 were cast by Bartholomew Atton in the year 1624. Mention of this

bell founder is first made at Buckingham in the year 1604. The latest dated bells in

the county by this man are our own bells at Blisworth. Little otherwise is known of

this family. Bell No. 4 together with its quaint spelling of the inscription was the

product of Henry Bagley 1713. This family sprang from the village of Chacombe (near

Banbury) the originators being the village black-smiths. They subsequently cast many

bells in this county, the next nearest to Blisworth being at Easton Neston and Greens

Norton.



The village of Chacombe was a forest village, hence the good supply of timber

with which to smelt the bell metal. A member of the Bagley family also advertised:

“...the said Henry Bagley (if desired) will cast any ring or rings of bells in the

town (to whom) they belong” . . . This practise of casting or tuning the bells in

one‟s own churchyard was a common practice wherever timber was available.



From the earliest times bells were christened, but from the time of the

reformation such christenings got a little out of hand. Gilbert White tells when the

new bells were brought to Selborn, the treble bell was fixed bottom up and filled with

“punch”. This form of profane “christening” has fortunately become a thing of the

past, and the dedication of bells has taken its place.



The English have been for so many generations admirers of the melody produced

by a “ring of bells”, that long ago we became known to our overseas vsitors as the

“Ringing Island”. There are recorded cases, however, where ringing of bells was not

always acceptable, and in one case the town stated that the ringing of bells turned

all the drink sour. But the love of bells is still universal in this country, and

there must be very many of us who wish to hear our own bells ringing forth once again.

Let us hope that this wish will be granted before many years have passed.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [7]





Having dealt with the general dates of the structure of the church in the

previous issues, together with the history of the bells, I think that it is necessary

at this stage to clear our minds of the present general “look” and outline of the

church, both exterior and interior, for both have suffered many changes in the

lifetime of this ancient building. Not only did certain alterations take place before

and during the reformation, but major changes took place in the last century (which is

often referred to as the “mishandling period”) when so many of our parish churches

underwent complete alterations to furnishings and fabric. This surge of restoration

was carried out by over-zealous squires and lords of the manor . . . yes, and moneyed

parsons too! So for the next few months I will attempt to give you a picture of the

medieval church and the subsequent changes which have produced the church as we see it

to-day.



Following the installation of the great windows in the 15th century, it appears

that only minor changes have taken place with the windows. Some have lost their stone

mullions, and the window at the west end of the north aisle appears to have been

altered and the lower part blocked up, others have been restored. The great windows

would have been filled with stained glass pictures; the only remnant of these past

glories is to be found in the tracery of the north west window of the chancel. All

other stained glass is modern.



If the “old folk” were to come back I think they would show the greatest

surprise at the “skyline” or “roof outline”, for originally the church was capped with

a very shallow-pitched roof to both chancel and nave, lead covered and much less bold

than the present steep-pitched slated roof. It is highly probable that there would

have been a simple porch with a flat roof. (The present porch was built in 1607.)

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [8]





As the first service of the new year was that of holy communion I feel that it

is fitting that the first historic notes should also begin around the “Lord‟s table”.



To so many people the contents of our churches are thought to be of an

unchanging pattern, but this is far from the truth, for many alterations have taken

place during the long history of the building, each change telling of the social,

economic and religious upheavals of the country.



We can assume that in the pre-reformation years we should have seen a carved

stone altar placed against the east-end wall, and well decked with the ornaments of

the time. Reference to this has come down to us in the wills of two important

Blisworth residents. In 1528 Emma Wake died and left by her will “to the hygh alter a

curcho for a corporas . . .”, and again in 1557 John Curtis (priest and schoolmaster)

by his will “I give to the town of Blysworth to the use of Gods service to be

mayntayned within the said church . . .a chales with a paten, a corporas with a case,

and two vestments to serve God . . .”



The religious changes bought about by the accession of Edward VI, Mary and

Elizabeth, were the main cause of much destruction and re-arranging within the

chancel. With Edward VI the “Hygh Alter” was removed and a table called the “table

of the Lord” was placed in the centre of the chancel, the congregation standing or

sitting around it. On the accession of Mary, many of the old stone altars were

restored, but on the accession of Elizabeth the “Lord‟s table” was again introduced.

These Elizabethan tables were often rich in woodcarvings.



It is said that towards the end of the 16th century archbishop Laud was so

shocked at the irreverent attitude of the people when the communion table was placed

in the centre of the chancel that he gradually influenced the church officials to

replace the tables against the east-end wall, as in former days and to erect rails for

people to kneel at during the service of communion. These rails were also intended to

keep dogs from defiling the table.



Our own very fine communion rails date from the mid 17th century. It is fairly

certain that from this time little or no change took place within our chancel until

the middle of the last century. The floor was then covered with the then fashionable

encaustic tiles, together with the wall at the back of the “new” table. Our present

setting was created in 1910 when Captain Elmhurst of Blisworth House gave the

beautiful carved reredos and the raised oak floor. The “Victorian” table was encased

within an oak superstructure specially made to carry the numerous new needle-worked

frontals. The only change to take place from that date has been the removal of the

1850 communion table from within the case, and this now stands next to the south door.



Curcho . . . a kerchief

Corporas . . .a cloth on which the consecrated elements were placed.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [9]





I have one small correction to make to last month‟s history notes concerning

the reredos. This I stated was erected by Capt. Elmhurst to the memory of his wife,

but I am corrected by three people – friends with long memories – Mr.& Mrs. W. Collins

and Mr. E. Ayres, and they all state that the donor was the deceased lady‟s sister.



For this month‟s notes we will concern ourselves with the two oldest pieces of

the church communion plate, both of which are in regular use in our services. Our

oldest piece, a communion cup made about 1570, is a fine specimen of the silversmith‟s

craft. The second piece in age is a delightful paten, which was in all probability

made as a cover for the 1570 cup in approximately 1636.



At this stage before we move to the later plate, I will make one or two

observations on the history of church communion plate in general. You will have

noticed that we do not possess any pre-reformation plate. Practically all church

plate disappeared at this time. Henry VIII suppressed all religious houses in his

realm in 1539-40 and, of course, appropriated their possessions. He instructed his

commissioners to leave only sufficient silver vessels for the use of the church. Many

incumbents and churchwardens began to dispose of their church plate. Between 1547 and

1552 a great many churches were said to have been broken into; often this was a

pretence to account for the disappearance of the silver which the rector or his

wardens had secretly disposed of. In 1552 King Edward “collected” more of the

remaining items of silver, instructing his commissioners to leave “one, two or more

chalices or cuppes according to the multitude of the people.” Many chalices at this

time were also melted down and refashioned into cups.



Of all the pre-reformation treasure and silver plate at one time existing in

the parish churches of Northamptonshire, only one piece remains – at Welford. One can

easily understand how well the King‟s commissioners did their work.



(References to the church plate are taken from “The Church Plate of the County of

Northampton 1894”.)

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [10]





The Rev. William Barry, M.A., late of Trinity College, Cambridge, was

instituted into the old Tudor rectory standing alongside the church. He evidently

disapproved of this old building, for he built for himself and for his family a fine

new rectory in 1842, and forthwith demolished the old former building. He also built

the stables and coach house, which have just been demolished in the new road widening

scheme. During his 45 years as rector many major alterations took place.



Among his many gifts to the church were three pieces of plate. A silver paten

made in 1845, a silver cup made in 1845, and a silver alms dish made in 1846, each of

these three items bears the words: “Presented to the Church of Blisworth by the Rector

A.D. 1846”. The remaining and largest piece of church silver is a fine flagon which

was made in 1870, and this flagon bears the text: “Christmas est immollatus nostram

pascha”. The donor of this is not recorded.



The Rev. Barry resigned in April of 1884 but he did not live long after, for he

died on December 10th of the same year and was buried in Blisworth church-yard, aged

81 years. We also had a collection of pewter plate up to the coming of the Rev. W.

Barry, but in 1843 it is recorded that this plate “appears to be lost”.



It might interest readers to know the value of the silver plate. At last years

valuation it was £460.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [11]





During the next few months we will survey the chancel ornaments and furniture.



At the rear of the communion table, and on a ledge which constitutes a part of

the reredos, stand two brass candlesticks, and either two or four brass flower vases.

We have no record of the donors of these items, but they were presumably given during

the past 80 years.



The centrepiece is a nicely proportioned brass cross, perfectly plain, and

standing on a squared stepped plinth. The cross carries this inscription:-



William Whitlock

Sexton 1872 – 1905



Which with the passing of the years, and the vigour of the polishers, is becoming

less readable every year.



This William Whitlock was a colourful character and very much in keeping with

his forebears and his name-sake follower. Apart from his office as sexton and parish

clerk he was always willing to lend a hand with the club books or the village flower

show etc. “Uncle William” was by trade a clock and watchmaker and repairer, and was

affectionately known as “clocky”. Not the least of his jobs was to run the village

“sparrow club”. This organisation was sponsored by the Duke of Grafton and donated to

by the farmers. Its function was to encourage the extermination of the sparrow

population, which certainly did much damage to the corn crops. Netting the birds at

night, together with the robbing of the nests, resulted in the destruction of

thousands of birds annually. Prices paid were as follows: 3d per dozen for eggs and

young birds, which were called bolshins or bolchers, while for the adult birds 1d each

was paid.



William Whitlock died on March 13th, 1905 aged 69 years.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [12]





Last month a brief mention was made of two existing candlesticks. It is fairly

certain that the candle and holder have been in unbroken use within the church for as

long as the building has existed. Even after the reformation when so many items of

church plate were discarded, the candle holder and candle were very necessary items

for the illumination of the building during services.



After many centuries the candle, the wax taper, and the rush light holders gave

way to the oil lamp, and it is to be regretted that with the introduction of the new

form of lighting most of the delightful wrought iron brackets and holders were

discarded as worthless. None of these old fittings have survived at Blisworth,

although some are to be found in other churches in Northamptonshire.



We do however know a little about the numerous “lights” that were in Blisworth

church in medieval times. It was a general thing for parishioners to bequeath certain

items or money to the church, and from the wills of a few Blisworth people I have made

the following selection, all of which refer to “lights”.



William Denton bequeathed “a scheepe to ye lyghte before our lady” . . . this

sheep would then be sold and the money used for the purchase of candles to be used as

directed by the deceased. Elizabeth Tymys “left” a “Stryke of Barle” (barley) for the

same light. Richard Denton left a “pounde of wax‟ for a light.



Bees-wax from the honey comb was one of the main ingredients of the candle or

taper, which besides burning with a steady light, gave off a very pleasant aroma.

Mention is made in some Northamptonshire wills of whole hives of bees being given to

the church for the production of wax. (It is well that this does not happen to-day,

for volunteer “wax getters” would be few and far between.



Finally, in 1526, William Water requested in his will that his wife should

provide “a lyghte to burn at all service tyme on Sundaies and Holidaes whilst she

liveth”.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [13]





The chancel will continue to be our focal point for some months to follow, for

this section of our church contains so much of interest.



There is little doubt that in pre-reformation days we should have found a

wealth of colour, for the walls were undoubtedly covered with murals; the woodwork too

would have been painted and gilded. During the reformation the paintings and other

objects, together with the stained glass and statues, disappeared. This wholesale

stripping left the chancels very bare, and whether by compromise or in a true effort

for the edification of the people, Queen Elizabeth ordered that the bare walls be

covered with panels on which the ten commandments, the Lord‟s prayer and the creed be

painted.



Only the panels containing the commandments survive at Blisworth these not

originals. Our two tablets, like so many other church fittings, have been subject to

change, for when the new reredos was installed in 1910 they were removed from the east

wall and placed on the north wall, one on each side of the door. It was during the

incumbency of the late Rev. G. Lunn that they were removed from the side aisle and

once more restored to their rightful place of honour in the chancel.



The correct name for these tablets is the decalogue – “deka” from the Greek

meaning “ten”, and “logos” meaning “words” – the ten words or sayings.

HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [14]





We have now come to the modern items of furniture in the chancel. Of the three

chairs, two are in the late Victorian “gothic” manner, so beloved by the church

restorers of the last century. These two chairs are often referred to as “bishop‟s

chairs”, for they are only used by the visiting bishop or special clergy. The earlier

ones would have been in all probability fine examples of early carving. Going back

further into medieval times we might have found a sedilia set in the south wall of the

chancel. These stone seats were usually the most ornate features of the chancel and

many fine examples still exist in other churches in the county.



Between world wars one and two the litany desk was made and donated to the

church by Robert Shakeshaft, who was the millwright and carpenter at Wesley Bros.

flour mill in the village. The remaining items of furniture are post-war gifts.



In 1947 the mothers‟ union banner was dedicated. This banner stands on an

interesting base, made locally of oak and wrought iron. On the scrolls are carved oak

shields on which are regimental devices of the following:-



The Royal Engineers

The Grenadier Guards

The Royal Air Force



These were the sections of the armed forces in which the sons of the donors

served. The banner was given as a thank-offering to God for their safe return from

the war. The carving on the base was the work of Mr. J. Reynolds of Northampton, who

claims to have examples of his work (in wood or stone) in most churches in

Northamptonshire



The two latest gifts are the alms dish and the oak credence table. In medieval

times the credence table was often constructed in stone and its use then, as now, has

been in the preparation of the bread and wine for the communion service.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [15]





So many of us when away on holiday, get a great deal of pleasure from a visit

to an old castle or church, yet so many of us fail to visit the ancient buildings in

our own locality. Might I suggest that you keep together your News Sheets so that you

or your summer visitors, might find pleasure in paying a visit to your own parish

church and to recapitulate on some of its 800 years of history.



This month we will take a further look at the chancel windows, particularly

those with the stained glass. In the north wall of the chancel are two large windows,

one of which contains some interesting panels of medieval stained glass. It is safe

to assume that the whole of this and the other windows would have contained early

stained glass. The popular way to tell of the disappearance of this early glass is to

blame the reformation or Cromwell‟s troops. It was not until early in the 19th

century that stained glass made a re-appearance in our parish churches, encouraged

perhaps by the new Oxford Movement which made it its business to encourage much more

colour and decoration.



Like all new fashions, the stained glass was often overdone, and in many

churches almost every window was filled with heavy coloured glass so that the daylight

was quite excluded. It was not until 1872 that the first of our chancel windows was

bedecked, when a memorial window was placed to the late squire of the village George

Stone and his wife Mary. This window is considered to be a fine piece of

craftsmanship, and its general colour and design are based upon the nearby remnants of

medieval glass.



The east window contains a memorial window to William Barry, M.A., rector for

45 years, and to Francis his wife. This could have been erected about 1885. The

large window on the south wall again contains a memorial stained glass to the memory

of a son of the rector, who died when nine years of age. This is rather a heavy

example of Victorianism.



Many people are not fond of windows filled with coloured glass, and for a

superb example of a church without such, one should have a look at Rothersthorpe,

which Betjeman calls “a piece of Georgian delight”.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [16]





Many people name the east end of the chancel the “sanctuary”, referring also to

the belief that should a fugitive take shelter therein he can escape justice. In

olden days this was partly so, but the whole church together with the churchyard

constituted a unit of sanctuary, provided that such places had been dedicated.



As early as the 7th century reference occurs to the sanctuary rights, whilst in

the 9th century the privilege of sanctuary for seven days and nights was allowed to

any fugitive who took refuge in a the church. This gave the offender time to provide

for his safety or to compound for the offence. By 1189 the period of sanctuary was

extended to 40 days



A person accused of felony, or in danger of such accusation, might flee to any

church, and once within the church, or in consecrated ground, could set any pursuer or

law officer at defiance. Before the end of that period he was expected to send for

the coroner and confess the crime. There-upon the coroner was to administer an oath

of abjuration whereby the offender pledged himself to cross the seas to some other

christian country within a given time, and to accept banishment for life. The refugee

was sent away penniless, clothed in sackcloth and carrying a white cross. He would be

directed to go to a port and to find a vessel. Such ports were Dover, Yarmouth or

Bristol. He was compelled to keep to the king‟s highway, and he was passed on from

constable to constable.



These rights of sanctuary were a most merciful provision to afford some

protection to human life, and the church was entirely in the right in adhering most

sternly to her prerogative. If anyone interfered with the fugitive while in sanctuary

or when on the road to a port, it was considered a grave offence and due punishment

was handed to the offenders.



When a fugitive was in a church, the parishioners had to provide him with food,

and a careful watch was kept outside to prevent his escape. The four neighbouring

parishes were generally responsible for the performance of this unpleasant duty. If

the fugitive escaped the parishioners were fined.

The rights of sanctuary were entirely abolished in the year 1623.



(next month I will tell of known cases of sanctuary seekers in this area, and

where mention is made of Blisworth.)

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [17]





Although no actual case of sanctuary seeking is recorded at Blisworth, certain

records exist telling of incidents involving neighbouring churches. These are worth a

mention, for it is quite certain that similar dramatic incidents would have happened

within our own church.



It is not difficult to picture a hounded man running down the village street

followed by his pursuers, and taking refuge in the churchyard and later seeking

sanctuary in the church. The news would soon reach the constable, whose job it would

be to post the four guards selected from the nearby villages. As soon as possible the

coroner would arrive and extract a confession from the wretched man, finally

despatching him to the nearest port for deportation.



On February 19th 1310, Osbert Scot fled from his pursuers and took refuge in

Quinton church. His four guards were taken from the villages of Preston Deanery,

Courteenhall, Piddington and Blisworth. On confessing his crime he was despatched to

Dover, there to find a ship to take him out of the country for ever.



A more gruesome case occurred nearby. Henry Felip of Stoke-Bruerne was found

dead at Courteenhall; his murderers were robbers, one of whom sought sanctuary in the

church at Wootton. He confessed to the coroner and was duly sent on his way to Dover,

but he attempted to escape and left the king‟s highway contrary to regulations. This

was his undoing, for the villagers of Wootton set about him and beheaded him, and his

hand was taken to Northampton and exhibited at the castle.



One other interesting case comes from Gayton. On the September 4th 1357, John

Stile fled to the Church there for sanctuary. He confessed that he was a thief,

having stolen a black horse worth 12d and another horse worth 18d. He was despatched

to Dover. His personal possessions were a pair of boots worth 2d., two knives worth

2d., a pair of spurs worth 1d., a hood at 2d., and leggings and shoes at 1d. These

were taken from him and given to Gayton to cover expenses.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [18]





During the next few issues of the News Sheet I will attempt to explain

something about certain architectural features which occur within our chancel walls,

both on the interior and the exterior. These features in question are generally named

“low side windows”. Now mostly blocked up, they are found in most of our parish

churches, and in some parts of the continent.



Little has been written about these fascinating features and in fact none of

the county historians made any reference to them until the middle of the last century,

although they wrote at length about all other constructional details of our village

churches.



Many village historians were always pleased to recount their own conjectural

accounts of the usage of these windows in their original form, before they were

blocked up. I well remember the late Rev. W. W. Colley telling his own story of how

these windows were used by the lepers who were not allowed to enter the church, in

fact he always referred to them as “leper‟s squints”.



Much research, however, was carried out in the county at the beginning of this

century by the late Christopher Markham, F.S.A., and it is from his notes that I take

much of the information for the next month or two. In the meantime, take a look at

our own low side windows. Firstly on the outside of the chancel, the one on the south

wall is almost square, while the north one is a delightful decorated one with a square

label and a pretty little trefoil head beneath.



What were these windows for and why were they blocked up? No good reason has

been assigned for the construction of them, and so many theories have been formulated

as to the use to which they were put, but little or nothing at all satisfactory has

been proposed. No two churches follow the same pattern, and in the case of our own

church both side windows are completely different in design throughout. They are

often referred to as “THE SPHINXES OF CHURCH ARCHAEOLOGY”.



Next month we will go into the known theories of their usage.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [19]



MISSING

[20]

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [21]





We now come to the dividing oak screen which separates the chancel from the

body of the church. In the early days of the church, the chancel was reserved for the

priests. The congregation was kept strictly to the nave or body of the church.



In medieval days every church had its rood screen with a rood loft and the

rood. The glory of the early church woodwork was its screen, which in the course of a

century developed from modest beginnings to the richness and variety hardly equalled

in any other sphere.



Two main types of screen and rood loft were developed throughout the land, but

it was the square framed type similar to ours which was chiefly built in the churches

of the midlands. A second type with much more elaboration was developed in the west

country, and many superb examples still exist, having in some strange way escaped the

destruction which followed the reformation.



Our screen was built at some time in the 15th century. All that remains to tell

of the rood loft is the very fine rood loft stairway, which is on the north side of

the chancel arch. It was more than likely that our rood loft was destroyed in the

reformation.



A writer in 1577 recorded that in the churches themselves “belles and times of

morning and evening services and praires remain as in the past, saving that All

images, shrines, tabernacles, ROOD LOFTS, and monuments of idolatric are removed,

taken down or defaced . . .” A vast amount of medieval craftsmanship that survived

the reformation was later destroyed by parliamentary troops under Cromwell.



Throughout the 17th and 18th centuries much of the fabric, including the

surviving screens, were left in the peace of semi-stagnation, their architectural

beauty ignored and little care taken for their preservation.



And so it must have been with our screen, for a major repair was presumably

carried out at the time of the re-roofing of our church (mid last century). At this

time the ugly and unfitting top beam was added, and this NOT of oak but stained white

wood.



In 1911 minor repairs were carried out at a cost of £11. 14. 0d., and in 1922

the screen again attracted attention for it was moved that a complete restoration

should be carried out. An estimate was obtained at a cost of £250 but this work was

never carried out.



Take a look at our screen and its very lovely tracery and workmanship . . .

Remember that it is 500 years old.



Next month we will talk about our screen as it was in pre-reformation days.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [22]





As mentioned last month, the chancel screen was the dividing line between the

people and the priest; often the doors of the screen were kept locked, but another

reason for this was to keep out the dogs (who were scavengers in those days) and

prevent them from fouling the sanctuary.



Over our screen was the great beam on which was built the loft. Access to this

was made by way of the fine stone stairway found by the north side of the screen, and

completely embodied in the thickness of the walls. In the centre of the loft was

fixed the rood; the dictionary gives the meaning of this word as “the cross of

Christ”. Upon this cross would be seen the carved wood image of Our Lord. It is also

fair to assume that flanking the figure of Christ would be seen the figures of the

Virgin and St. John. The rood screen, together with the statues, would be decorated

by foliage and candles on festival days, and during lent the whole rood would be

covered with a veil. A lamp would always be found burning in front of the rood. The

lower panels would also be painted with figures of the saints.



In some Northamptonshire churches an altar was also made in the rood loft; the

loft was used by the priest at certain times in the service and also by choir

soloists.



In those far off medieval days many parishioners left a legacy to maintain the

lights before the rood, or to defray the cost of painting or re-gilding the woodwork

and the statues. It is from the wills of certain Blisworth people during 1450 to 1558

that we know a little of our own church fitments.



In 1514 John Wodell left “two stryke of barle to the Rode”, and John Curtis,

who you remember was the village schoolmaster, left 16 pence to “ye roode light” in

1557. H. Burly in 1557 bequeathed 12 pence to “ye Rode”. Also mentioned in certain

wills were “shepe” and “strykes of barley” to the statue of St. John the Baptist and

to “Our Lady”.



During the late medieval period the space between many roods and the chancel

arch were enclosed with a wooden structure upon which would be painted the figures

previously found in statue form. This fitment was called a tympanium, but there is no

evidence that such a structure was used at Blisworth.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [23]





Before I continue the next series dealing with the remaining interior features

of our parish church, I would like to say a few words on some of the festivities which

churchmen and women have enjoyed over the past centuries.



We at Blisworth have recently held, what has already become, a post-war

“annual” – our shrove tuesday supper. Our menu is not truly a traditional one, for we

should by ancient custom make pancakes for all with eggs. Shrove tuesday is the

culmination of the period of shrovetide which comes immediately before lent. In the

middle ages the people “shrove” themselves, or made their annual confession of sins,

after which they would give themselves to much feasting and jollification.



The custom of making pancakes on shrove tuesday marks a relic of the last use

of eggs before the lenten fast, during which they were not allowed to be eaten. Eggs

re-appeared again on Easter day symbolizing new life, even as to-day we have the

custom of giving chocolate eggs at Easter.



It was from such festivities as shrove tuesday that the church was able to make

a little profit towards the upkeep of the fabric or for running costs in general.



The French celebrate shrove tuesday in great form, making it the concluding day

of a series of carnivals and merrymaking. This day they call “mardi gras”.



On other “high days” of the Church‟s calendar, such as our own Blisworth

“feast” in June, or Whitsuntide, merrymaking was organised by the church, and these

occasions were called “church ales”. “The church ale”, says one of our bishops, “was

the most universal resort for eliciting the bounty of the parish. It was the parish

feast and corresponded to a certain extent to our modern parochial suppers, fetes or

bazaars, etc.”



The ancient “church ale” however, was on a much larger scale, often lasting two

or three days. The “ale”, so called, which was brewed for a “church ale”, was a sweet

beverage made with hops or bitter herbs. It was not like our modern beer. It was much

less heavy and was probably hardly intoxicating. Friends from neighbouring villages

were invited, food and drinks were purchased, and the proceeds went to church funds.



Unfortunately no balance sheet or record exists of “church ales” held at

Blisworth. Malt and barley were often mentioned in the wills of Northamptonshire

people, being bequeathed towards the brewing of the “ale”. The following is a summary

of the balance sheet of a “church ale” held in a little Shropshire village 390 years

ago:-



Expenditure: Nine bushils of wheat 9s. 4d. Eight barrels of beer 11s. 8d.

Three calves 9s. 4d. Two Sheep 5s. 5d.

Geese, pig and hare 1s. 5d. Chickens 6d.

Butter and eggs 6d. Wood 1s. 9d.

For the Minstral 1s 8d. For Rushes, making clean the barn etc.3d.





The total expenditure on this occasion amounted to £2. 12. 2d. and the total

receipts were £4. 9. 5d., leaving a net profit of £1. 17. 3d., which would amount to

between £20 and £30 at the present value of money. [1965]

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [24]





For the next few months I hope to interest you in the mural tablets, tombs and

decorations found within our church, but before doing so it is as well to recap on the

historical data of monuments in general. It is almost certain that the Egyptians were

the first to make use of stone to mark the place of burial – plain stone slabs being

used at first, then a form of decoration which has slowly developed to this day, just

as our simple wall paper designs change from year to year. With the coming of

christianity the decoration took a new form, for the stone would be dedicated, and

incised with the mark of a christian – later evolving into an actual cross.



The first stone monuments to be used in this country were introduced by the

Romans, followed by an ever changing pattern through the Roman/British years, into and

through the anglo-norman, then to the elaborate medieval period. Although there are

thousands of good examples in the country of tablets and monuments from all these

periods, only the very fine table tomb of the early 16th century exists at Blisworth,

but that will be dealt with in a following history note.



Following the destruction during the reformation there were few memorials

during the Commonwealth, but from then on the pattern and design took on a “free for

all”. By the end of the Victorian era many churches had become so full of tablets and

monuments that it sometimes became necessary to remove earlier ones to give the new

ones a place.



There is a fast growing interest in all forms of monuments, and far from being

a morbid subject the study can be very interesting. One can learn from the type of

stone used, whether local or imported; and also the types of lettering, executed by

either the most expert of craftsmen or the local mason, who often made spelling

mistakes. During the last century the wording and verse flowed in such a way that the

reader knows all about the deceased except the colour of his or her hair.



Having reviewed briefly the historic side of monuments, I will commence next

month with the earliest of the wall tablets within our own church.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [25]





We will begin our inspection of the wall tablets at the eastern end of the

chancel, and on the south wall. Here we find a delightful 17th century mural memorial

measuring approximately 20 ins. by 22 ins. It commemorates the death of Margaret

Blackey who died when 99 years of age. She was married when only 18 years, and her

husband died when she was 30, leaving her with a very long widowhood of 61 years,

which of itself is a life time to many people.



It also tells that her husband was a man of some importance, for he was a

sergeant at arms to Queen Elizabeth I and later to King James (1603-25). Margaret

herself lived through the troublesome times of Elizabeth, James, Charles I, the

Commonwealth and Charles II. In all probability her husband would have met Sir Walter

Raleigh and William Shakespeare.



The lettering of the tablet is worth a second look, for it is executed in the

free style of the period, and to our present day standard suggests a rather amateur

hand in its layout and spacing.



For the benefit of those readers who have not seen this memorial I will

conclude with a copy of the whole tablet.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [26]





Last month we commenced our inspection of the wall tablets which are to be

found in our church. The first one told of the long life of Margaret Blackey who died

aged 99 years, and according to the tablet in the year 1673.



With the rector‟s permission, I checked on this date in the ancient register of

births, marriages, and deaths, and I was surprised to find that the entry of Margaret

Blackey‟s death was plainly in January 1674, she being buried on January 22nd of that

year. Was this an error? With further research I was able to clear up this little

mystery, for I found that at this time the Church had a yearly system of its own which

ran from the 25th March until the following 24th March. This was termed “in the style

of the Church of England”. In the sixteenth century some registers began a new year

on still other days. This system of over-lapping the yearly entries came to an end in

1752 when the Church began its entries with the correct calendar year. So although

Margaret Blackey did in fact die in January 1674, she was entered in the Church of

England year 1673.



In that same year 1673-4, the register contains the names of nine other people

who died and were buried at Blisworth, but it is regretted that in accordance with

custom no ages were recorded, the exception being that of the tenth entry, Margaret

Blackey, which carried her age (99) in brackets. Her age must have been outstanding.



Of the seventeen entries for this period, the remaining ones are divided into

six baptisms and only one marriage, which does not exactly constitute a good picture

for the continuity of the population. The rector who officiated at all these

ceremonies was Jonathen Yates A.M., who was incumbent from 1663 until his death in

1687.





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [27]





Last month we dealt with the tablet on the south wall of the chancel. Opposite

to this on the north wall is an identical tablet in design and lettering which was

certainly executed by the same craftsman. This tablet carries the following

inscription:-

“In this place is buried Rebekah who was the Wife

of my right hand and joy fortie and foure yeares

ten months and one weeke.

It‟s test (obliterated} Jonath Yates huius eccl:

Rect : Sept 22: 1679”



Unfortunately the third word of the last paragraph has been deeply scratched

out, but a literal translation of this Latin means that Jonathan Yates witnessed and

made this delightful statement about his wife and their 44 years

of married life. This Rev. Jonathan Yates was rector of

Blisworth from 1663 to 1687, and was the incumbant who buried

Margaret Blackey who was mentioned last month.



Above this tablet is yet another one of a later date, but owing to the paint

flaking it is not too easy to read. It carries this inscription:-



“Near this place lies the body of the Rev Mr

Thomas Ward Rector of this parish for 38 years

Died the 27 of Nov 1762 in the 79 year of his age.

Also Mrs Ann Ward His wife who died the 25 day

of Dec 1739 in the 53 year of her age.”



In the year that the Rev. Thomas Ward died the register contains nine entries

of births and baptisms, five entries of burials, but no mention of marriages. Two of

the entries of births give the names of mothers, followed by the words “the father a

stranger”.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [28]







On the south wall of the chancel are four white marble tablets. One of these

tells of Joseph Ambrose Lawson, Esq., M.D., who was born in the City of Waterford on

July 26th, 1806, and died on February 11th, 1864. He was Deputy Inspector General of

Army Hospitals. This same tablet also recalls the death of his widow, Caroline

Susannah, who died at Vevey in October, 1888.



(Vevey – town of the Lake of Geneva, Switzerland.)



The other three tablets are tablets to the memory of the Barry family, the topmost one

to Rose Maria, wife of the Rev. Henry T. Barry, rector of Blisworth, 1884-1904.



The second tablet is to the memory of Henry Thomas Barry, M.A., who was born at

Blisworth in 1847, and was educated at Eton and Trinity College, Cambridge, and who

followed in his father‟s footsteps and was rector of Blisworth for twenty years.



The third tablet is to the memory of the Rev. William Henry Barry, M.A., who

was rector of Blisworth from 1904-1914, and was the third generation to hold the

living here.



It was this rector‟s grandfather who came down from Whitby in 1839 to become

rector of Blisworth, building the new rectory in 1842 from stone excavated from the

rectory farm on west bridge hill. This family of grandfather, son, and grandson,

reigned supreme for nearly a century and witnessed many changes in the social and

domestic affairs of the village.



It was during the incumbency of the first of the Barrys, 1839-1884, that the

complete restoration of the church was undertaken and the seating enlarged to

accommodate 400 worshippers – and I am told that often all seats were filled.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [29]



MISSING

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [30]





It is fitting that I should include our “War Memorial” tablets in this month‟s

history notes. Wars have always robbed men from the villages of this land from time

immemorial, but for the ordinary man who so lost his life there was seldom a memorial

raised or word written in our local records. Should the squire or lord of the manor

lose his life or that of members of his family, then that was quite a different

matter; many of our county churches are filled with tablets and memorials which record

every detail of the time and place of death, the regiment in which he served, and many

other details of the fallen man.



Our church warden‟s account books record the families of some of the men who

were conscripted during the Napoleonic Wars of 1800-1815. Their families received

monies from the poor rate, but it does not record the names of any of these serving

men who did not return – if any. It was not until the terrible losses of men in

battle during World War One that the nation was involved in erecting “War Memorials”

in every village, upon which were placed the names of the fallen. This roll of honour

did not include the names of the untold heroes who, although they came home, yet they

were so stricken in body and mind that they died many years after the war which

actually cause their deaths.



The following names of those who gave their lives in World War One are taken

from the village war memorial, headed by the inscription:-





“Greater love hath no man than this.”



William Adams Alec Alfred Harris

John Robert Clarke William Edward Britton

Joseph Drew Arthur Pullen

Charles Valentine Frank Botteril

Ernest Vivian Hare Sidney Albert Basford

Jack Webster William Albert Hawes

Walter Arthur Billingham Harry George Perkins

Bertram John Goode Arthur Edward Carter

Frederick George Howes Joseph Thomas Clarke

William Bodsworth Robert Mellish Birch

Cecil William Ayres Frank Foster

Ralph Paxton



This tablet was erected by public subscription.



A Memorial Cross also stands in the churchyard likewise bearing the twenty-

three names of the fallen in World War One. This cross was given to the village by

the late Mr. John Griffith in gratitude for the safe return of his two sons from the

war. This memorial also carries the names of the only two men to lose their lives

from this parish in World War Two, 1939-1945:-



Percy George Malin and Thomas Alfred Whitmore





There is one other tablet in the church which in greater detail records the

death of Cecil Ayres who was killed at Havringcourt in France in September 1918,

whilst serving with the King‟s Own Yorkshire Light Infantry.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [31]





With Christmas so near and “charity” in our minds, we will take a look at the

wall board in the belfry upon which are the following words:-



This is the only charity administered by the

Mrs. Leeson left to

church at Blisworth. Most villages have a

the Poor of this Parish

Thirty Shillings a year charity of some kind or another. Mrs. Jane

For ever to be paid Leeson, spinster, of Abthorpe, left by her will

out of a Farm in Abth of the 27th March, 1646, a 6 acre close, 70

orpe to be Distribut acres of unenclosed arable land, and a meadow

ed by the Church-War of 4 acres named “Grass Croft”, all in the

dens & Over - Sees of village of Abthorpe, with the rents from these

the Poor :with the Ap, lands to provide for the relief of the poor in

probation, of the 25 villages in the vicinity.

MINISTER.





The amount that Blisworth was to have is recorded above, i.e. 30/-per annum; it

should be handed out on the 17th day of December each year by the churchwardens “at the

discretion, and in the presence of the vicar or curates of the several towns or

villages named”.



Mrs. Jane Leeson also built a school and schoolhouse at Abthorpe which was also

run out of the rents of the same lands. The Trustees (or feoffees) were instructed to

meet every May 30th, and an allowance was made for them to be provided with a meal, and

the sum of 4/- to be divided among them to cover their annual “expenses”.



Mrs. Leeson certainly never foresaw that her lands would increase in great

value, but because she so directed the actual figure to be given each year, the sum

cannot be increased in relation with to-day‟s income from the monies invested.



What happens to the accruing profits? Well, there are always “expenses” and in

1827, when 70 acres were enclosed, it cost many hundreds of pounds to plant hedges and

fence in the new fields. Since that time the land has been gradually disposed of and

the money re-invested in shares or bonds. Repairs to the schoolhouse and school take

some of the interest, and of late years it has gone towards the stipend of the rector

of Wappenham who in turn is parish priest of Abthorpe.



In the past, recipients of this charity at Blisworth have received 1/- per

year, but nowadays it is given totally to the Evergreen Club.



Oh, and one other little item which might worry some who kindly read these

notes! You will have noticed that although Jane Leeson was a spinster she was called

“Mrs.” Or “Mistress.” This was the general term for a lady irrespective of marriage

or not, much as we still call any man “Mister” after he has passed his youth, whether

married or bachelor.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [32]



MISSING

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [33]





We come to the last of the belfry wall tablets – yet another elm one on which

is painted the following words:-



In memory of Robert Watson Husband of Elizabeth Watson

Late Schoolmaster of this Parish who died Oct 14 1794 aged 54 years.



“in teaching the rising generation

He was respected in his station

His death was sudden and unexpected

Let preparation be not neglected.”



Richard Dunkley fecit





Robert Watson was only one of the long line of schoolmasters who had taught in

our village school, for as in many villages throughout the length and breadth of

England, similar schools, administered through the Church, had kept alive a continuity

of a system of education for all who wished to partake thereof.



During the early years of the Blisworth Endowed School, the master was often

the village priest also. One recorded instance of this is a certificate issued around

the year 1547:-



“ . . . to the intention to finde a prest to sing ther for ever . .

and the sayd prest to be a scholmaster to teach at the Free schole ther . . .”



The Blisworth Free School was founded somewhere around 1485 by Roger Wake Esq.,

and this endowed school continued under the direction of his heirs and successors,

together with the rectors of Blisworth for the next 500 years. During the life of the

school there were certainly many ups and downs, and the village fire of 1790

temporarily closed the school. A new one was soon erected (that which we now call the

“old school” and the church authorities were soon faced with the new challenge of the

events of the industrial 19th Century and the growing influence of the Baptist

movement.



Increase in the population caused the building to be enlarged, and a new infant

school was erected on the opposite side of Stoke Road, but overcrowding was one of the

contributory causes of the closure of the school in 1913. May 30th 1913 was the last

day of the old endowed school, ending too the influence of the church to a major

degree over the education of the village children, and the final chapter of the Free

School laid down by Roger Wake Esq. in those far off days in the 15th Century was

enacted. The council school commenced in June 1913 under the direction of the

minister of education with Mr. Arthur Green as Headmaster.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [34]





Having exhausted the supply of wall tablets, and before we come to the most

important of our memorials i.e. the Wake tomb, we will take stock of two fragments of

wood which have survived from the early 14th century.



These are two interesting pieces of wood carving, one in the shape of a

priest holding a shield, and the other, the most valuable, is a rare and interesting

specimen of a roof boss, once forming part of the old roof of the side chapel or nave.



The general design carries three figures. To make it complete a fourth one

should be there, but this is missing. Each figure represents one of the four

creatures mentioned in the vision of St. John in the Book of the Revelation, chapter 4

verse 7, also a similar vision is mentioned in Ezekiel, chapter 1 verse 10. The

complete boss would have carried the figures of a man, an ox, a lion and an eagle. It

is the figure of the lion which is missing.



The symbolical meaning of each figure has been variously interpreted, but

two interpretations are worthy of notice:-





1. Each carving being significant of the life and writing of the

authors of the Gospels:-



The Lion representing St. Matthew



The Ox representing St. Luke



The Man representing St. Mark



The Eagle representing St. John







2. The most reliable interpretation would be that each carving

expresses a different aspect of human nature:-





The Lion, strength, boldness and courage.



The Ox, unwearied and painstaking service.



The Man, understanding, tenderness and intellect



The Eagle, quickness, piercing insight

and ability to soar to nobler heights.







These four symbols have been artistically interpreted in wood, glass and fabric

throughout the christian world during the past centuries, and the most modern version

of the Lion, the Ox, and the Eagle are to be seen in splendour in the great tapestry

by Graham Sutherland now in Coventry Cathedral.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [35]





This is the badge of the Wake family, once

Lords lords of the manor of Blisworth, and now

represented by Major Sir Hereward Wake at

Courteenhall.



In the next few articles I will try to

tell bri tell briefly the history of this great family

up to up to the time of their departure from

Blisworth in 1552 or 1553, when they sold out

to Sir Richard Knightley of Fawsley.



Historians tell us that the Wakes are

“remarkable amongst English landed houses”

for their descent is from a Norman house.



(They are not connected with Hereward the Wake

of T.V. of T.V. fame – sorry!)









Throughout the 12th, 13th, 14th, 15th and 16th centuries their fortunes were very

varied. One was chief falconer to the king, another was killed by a cross bow in

battle, and one died when on a crusade supporting Simon, the Earl of Leicester, and

his heart is buried in the church of the holy sepulchre in Jerusalem. Another was

mixed up in the wars of the roses, and to complete the picture, yet another was

imprisoned in the Tower of London. By marriage too they were connected with some of

the great families – the Brewares, the Stutvilles, the Beauchamps and the Quencies.



A Sir Baldwin Wake first held the manor at Blisworth in 1265, but ill fortune

(or marriages) caused various changes of ownership until the year 1300 when Sir Hugh

Wake of Deeping in Lincolnshire took possession of the manor again. From then until

1523 there followed a direct line of four lords of the manor who were knights, and

then four lords of the manor who were esquires.



The last of the “knights” married the daughter of Sir Thomas Piggott, and it is

recorded that this was the first of the Wake “heads of family” to be buried in

Blisworth Church. There is no trace of this burial. His name was Sir Thomas Wake and

he in turn had a son, the first of the esquires, also named Thomas. On his death he

too was buried at Blisworth together with his wife, but again we have no knowledge of

his resting place.



This man also had a son and once more they named him Thomas (this continuity of

the same name makes this type of research very confusing). To continue, this third

Thomas became a member of the Council and Privy Chamber to King Edward IV. When he

died, he too was buried at Blisworth, and yet again no trace exists of his tomb.



We come now to his son and heir, Roger Wake Esquire, who together with his wife

is buried in the fine tomb now standing in the Wake side chapel. I will tell more of

this Roger Wake and his tomb next month.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [36]









This is our side chapel in which stands the tomb of Roger Wake esquire, and his

wife Elizabeth. As this unit within the church is contemporary with the early

structure of the church, it could well have been built for the Wake family at the end

of the 13th Century.



This fine memorial to the last of the Wake overlords of Blisworth is described

as a table tomb constructed of freestone and with a purbeck marble slab on top. The

sides are panelled with shields of arms. On the slab are the “ brasses” of Roger and

his wife, with groups of their seven sons and three daughters below, a shield in each

angle and a brass inscription around the verge as follows:-





“Here lyeth Roger Wake Esquyer Lorde of Blisworthe in the Countie

of Northampton and Elizabeth his Wife . . .(part missing) . . .

which Roger decessyd the XVI day of March in the yere of our

Lord God M0ccccciii on whose soule IHU have m‟cy.”





Behind this tomb is to be seen a wall recess with a flat moulded ogee arch.

This is not of the same period as the tomb, and it is now thought that the table tomb

has been moved at some time from its original position and placed against the south

wall of the side chapel. An interesting point which partly supports this theory is

that the panel on the east end of the tomb has been re-erected upside down.

We shall refer to this monument from time to time over the next few months, so

it will assist you if you keep this illustration of the complete chapel for visual

reference to the successive notes. Just to confuse the reader, the tomb inscription

records that Roger Wake died in 1503; in actual fact he died in 1504, but as I

mentioned in an earlier News Sheet, this was the system of the Church in overlapping

from April 1st, 1503, to March 31st, 1504.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [37]



Here we see the two rubbings from the “brasses” of Roger Wake, Esq., and

Elizabeth his wife. The originals are to be found on the top of the table tomb, and

they are let in flush in the marble slab by cutting away the stone to a similar shape

as the brasses (this is called a “matrice”) and then the brasses are riveted down by a

rivet of the same material.





Here we see Roger in a full armour except for his head

dress, and th dress, and the design of the whole suit is in the fashion

of the period. Roger also wears a collar and skirt of

of chain mail, and what was evidently the new fashion in

footwea footwear – a pair of broad or square toed shoes. The

previous design for armour footwear before approximately

1485 was a very pointed toe.









Elizabeth is seen wearing a

pedimented head dress, which

style came into vogue around

the time of Henry VII, made

from stiff material, and

entirely hid the hair. The

frontlet would be of thick

velvet over the forehead so as

to form a sharp and decided

angle, and hung down with

lappets on either side of the

face. The dress has tight sleeves with fur cuffs, and the

skirt is also trimmed with fur. The large embroidered belt

faced with silver, is seen buckled lightly around the waist,

and its end is allowed to almost touch the ground.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [38]





Additional to the two large “brasses” of Roger Wake and Elizabeth his wife, are

the two group “brasses” of their children, one representing their seven sons and the

other their three daughters.



In an age of the supposed survival of the fittest, it is not surprising to

learn that of this large family, three boys and one girl died in infancy. We are told

that the names of the two surviving girls were Elizabeth and Margaret, and the names

of the boys to reach manhood were Thomas (the oldest), then Richard, William and John.









Here I have sketched the likeness

of the three girls.

on most monumental brasses, all

children are shown whether

living or deceased.









And here we see three of the

At seven boys (Note their long

Bra hair).

Dec At this period of manufacture,

Bei brasses in general were on a

and decline of workmanship, figures

Mur being much more clumsily drawn

A and and faces shown in profile.

M Mural brasses came into fashion

also.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [39]



In last month‟s news sheet I wrote a little about the sons and daughters of the

Wake family who are represented on the “brasses” on the Wake tomb.



The boys would have roamed the tracks and countryside in and around Blisworth

much as the children of to-day enjoy the freedom of the fields. Instead of playing

beside the canal they would have had the pleasant brook which has now mostly lost its

identity in the bed of the canal, and also they would have had excellent fishing in

the large fish pond, the dried up area of which can still be plainly traced.



Thomas, the eldest son, unfortunately grew up to become the “black sheep” of

the family. We are told that he became a man of irregular life, and that by reason of

a certain trespass that he had done, he was locked up in the tower of London and stood

in grave danger of his life. This indeed was an affair of the family, especially as

his father had lost so much “face” and fortune following the battle of Bosworth Field.

Elizabeth, as you will remember, had remarried, but by making gifts of land to the

privy councillor, and others in high places, was able to ask Henry VII for a pardon

for her wayward son. This pardon was granted by the king in the year 1512, and Thomas

was again a free man and still the rightful heir to the Blisworth Manor.



Richard the second son, had taken over headship of the family during his

brother‟s imprisonment and was living at Hartwell where he raised a family of twelve

sons and six daughters by his first wife; we are not told whether he had sons and

daughters by his second wife. This said Richard, together with his two wives, are

buried at Rode (Roade).



John the third son also married and raised a family.



During the height of the family fortunes the Wake family had held the manor of

Blisworth, together with lands at Collingtree and Milton Malsor, but whatever was left

of these lands, together with the manor of Blisworth, “wayward” Thomas sold all to Sir

Richard Knightly of Fawsley in the years 1552-3, thus ending the long and eventful

lordship of the Wakes over the manor of Blisworth.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [40]





This month we will take a final look at the table top of the Wake tomb. Some

might say that a slab of cold stone is not of interest, but let us not dismiss this

monumental (in more ways than one!) piece of stone too lightly.



It measures approximately 6‟6” by 3‟6” and is 5” in thickness, polished on the

upper face only. Into this is let the “brasses” of Roger Wake and his wife, etc.

What does it weigh? Well, I would say anything between ten and fifteen hundred-

weights, no small size and weight to handle.



Most people at some time or other, when viewing the ancient monuments and

churches, are amazed at the dimensions of the stones used, and admiration is expressed

at the way in which they have been shaped, and also often hauled up to great heights.



In general the fabric of our church is of fairly local origin, but not so with

the tomb top. This once lay in its natural state deep in the hills of the coastal

area of Dorset. Most of us are familiar with the coast line west of Bournemouth, as

far as Swanage, and inland to Wareham. This area, though not a true island, is termed

“the Isle of Purbeck”, and it is from this small section that tens of thousands of

tons of stone have been excavated and sent all over the country, as well as the not so

common Black “marble” which was so sought after by the medieval church builders, and

it is of this marble that our tomb top is made. (The superb pillars in Westminster

Abbey are also of this celebrated Purbeck marble).



Now let us switch ourselves back in time to about the year 1505, when this

massive lump of stone would have been ordered and brought from Dorset to Blisworth –

no mean task in days when roads were next to non-existent, and tracks were only good

for heavy traffic at certain times of the year. It is, therefore, thought highly

probable that this stone would have commenced its journey to Blisworth by sea, for

this was the common method right up to the last century. As Blisworth was not on any

one of the navigable rivers, it is fair to assume that after the sea voyage it would

be brought down one of the rivers found to be most convenient to Blisworth, and then

for the last few miles by wagon and horses, finally reaching our church where it was

set up and completed as we see it to-day, some 450 years after.



The sides of the tomb are constructed from slabs of a much softer stone, and

they are carved with the shields and badges of the Wake and Catesby families. The

type of stone used in the construction of these side and end panels is “freestone”,

which is found in all lime stone areas, even locally, but they also could well have

been brought up from Purbeck, for the quarries there contain seams of many variations

of stone with names such as “freestone‟, “lannen vein”, “blue rag”, “marble”, and the

celebrated “Portland stone”.



So when you are next in Dorset, look around the villages of Worth and Langton

Maltravers; Kingstone, where there is a Purbeck marble church; Corfe; or Swanage;

much of the stone was shipped from these places. Some of the quarries open up right

off the cliff face. Having thus surveyed the land, think over again the epic journey

of the lump of marble which came safely up from those distant parts and which now is

the most important and interesting monument in our church. Better still, come and

have a look at the tomb when you have a few minutes, or when you have a visitor who

wishes to know a little about our village and its past.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [41]





As we do not have a crypt within our church to write about, we will take a

second look at the bell tower. This massive structure is of three stages. In the

bottom stage is a restored window in the west side, but the north and south sides are

blank. The second stage has a small trefoil opening on each side and is reached by a

long and almost vertical ladder. The opening on the north side is covered by the

clock dial.



I have not been able to trace the original installation of the clock, but the

present clock works were purchased during the incumbency of the Rev. George Mallett,

who negotiated for their purchase from his old parish of Chudleigh in Devon. I wonder

how many of us are aware of the weekly physical effort in winding the clock by

voluntary labour. If this were not done many of the village folk would miss the

friendly striking, and thousands of motorists would also miss the good timekeeping as

they take a hurried glance at the clock face.



The top, or bell chamber, has a two trefoiled light on each side. These lights

are also fitted with louvres to deflect the bell notes over the village. These

windows are topped by a quatrefoil. The tower terminates in a battlemented parapet

without pinnacles. The total space of the bell chamber is taken up with the massive

frames of oak timbers in which hang the five bells. It is on one of these beams that

the date 1624 is cut. This could well have been the year in which a major restoration

of the bell frame took place, and when added bells were installed.



Prior to 1960 the roof was a four square pitched structure, covered with sheet

lead and supported on a radial joist frame, the centre of which was held up by a

single “king pin” of oak which in turn was carried on two great crossed horizontal

beams. The new roof is flat and is covered in copper.



The accompanying photos were taken by Mr. K. J. Stewart before the restoration

of the tower.





This shows the pointed lead

covered roof prior to 1960. Note

the crumbling parapet stones.









Here we see the date

“1624” cut into one of

the bell frame beams.









This shows the

radial frame of the roof

held up by the massive king

pin of oak. Note the bad

condition of the timbers.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [41b]





William John Whitlock



This month I am going to digress from our usual church history and make mention of

William John Whitlock who died on Monday, 10th October, 1966, aged 93 years.



William Whitlock (affectionately known as “Witty” to the whole district)

retired from the duties of sexton in 1956 after thirty-five years of devoted service

to the church and to the village. Village craftsman, carpenter (the two oak book

cupboards and the oak processional cross in the church are examples of his good

workmanship), lamplighter, handyman and undertaker, he became a most colourful

character and his escapades and “fire-side” stories will become legendary.



He was the last of the village boys who received their education at the old

grammar school at Courteenhall. His uncle, William Whitlock, was sexton for thirty-

four years (1872 – 1905), during which years young William received his early training

in church affairs by assisting his uncle whenever possible.



By living in the same village all his days, and by his long association with

the church, he was, in his own words, able to ”Christen „em, Marry „em and Bury „em”,

but I will let the late Reverend Howard T. N. Usher (Baptist Minister at Blisworth)

speak the final words in his poem, written and dedicated to William John Whitlock when

he was sixty, in the year 1933.









His evensong.



Whitlock, I love to hear your bell

Take lead and tell

That God is calling to His own

From the grey stone

Of Church and aisle,

To come and meet with Him awhile.

Just threescore years have fallen white

On belfry height;

Yet with unfaltering step you climb

To check the time,

That all may know

Whether their clock is fast or slow.



Your bell should have a tongue of gold:

She oft has told

Of Christmas and of Eastertide,

Christ and his bride,

A Church that waits

For God to enter at her gates.



One final note – her very soul

Speaks when you toll;

So, William may we hear at last,

When life has past:

God‟s peace ring out o‟er human wrong

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [42]





In the September history notes we had “arrived” at the top of the tower, and I

made mention of the old roof being supported (prior to the restoration in 1960) by two

heavy crossbeams on which stood the upright king pin. What I should have said was

that only one of the massive crossbeams was complete, because the under one had had a

four foot length sawn from it, which can only be recorded as being inexcusably

erroneous. Evidently at the time of the re-hanging of the bells, (possibly as early

as the 17th century) it was necessary to install a windlass by which to wind up, or

lower the bells to and from the bell frames. It was thus that the great cross beam

was cut through to allow this capstan windlass to be used. In the actual photo one

can see the two sections of the beam with the windlass roller passing through the gap

at right angles.



In the accompanying sketch I have attempted to show the position of the

complete windlass with its fittings. It is not uncommon to find equally stupid errors

in many of our old buildings, and it would be interesting to know if other churches in

the county have similar instances of this windlass feature.









Here we see the windlass

roller passing through the gap sawn

out of the main cross beam.









This sketch diagram

illustrates the method by which

the windlass would have been used

to draw up and lower the bells at

the time of re-hanging.





Many of us would like to hear the bells ring out at this Christmas time, but

this will not be possible, so to conclude the history notes for this month I will give

you an extract from Tennyson‟s:-



“In Memoriam”



Ring out, wild bells, to the wild sky, the flying cloud, the frosty night;

The year is dying in the night, ring out wild bells, and let him die.



Ring out the old, ring in the new! Ring happy bells across the snow;

The year is going, let him go, ring out the false, ring in the true.



Ring out old shapes of foul disease, ring out the narrowing lust of gold,

Ring out a thousand wars of old, ring in the thousand years of peace.



Ring in the valiant man and free, the larger heart, the kindlier hand,

Ring out the darkness of the land, ring in the Christ that is to be.



THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [43]





This history item will conclude the exploration of the church tower, and apart

from climbing the flag pole we certainly have arrived at the top! Before the tower

was re-roofed in 1960 the roof was four sided and pitched, and covered with heavy

gauge lead sheets. During the long life of this ancient roof many people had climbed

the tower, possibly to fulfil an ambition, or to survey the surrounding countryside.



It was during the turn of the 18th Century that so much change occurred within

our parish, and what better place was there for a survey point than the church tower?

From it engineers, working on the canal construction which began in 1793, could well

have viewed the “lay of the land”; the tunnel was completed in 1805, and

Northamptonshire‟s first railway ran from west bridge wharf, just below the tower,

over the hill to Stoke-Bruerne (1800-1805). The Fields were enclosed around this time

and planted with the familiar pattern of quick thorn hedge; in fact the whole of the

parish under went a great change.



Many of the people who went up the tower in those long ago days were locals.

Hundreds of them at least left their mark by inscribing their names or initials on to

the lead, and in many instances they placed their boot or hand, upon the lead and

incised the outline, leaving a bold and interesting fashion parade of footwear of the

time. I regret now that I did not take many more of these marks before the lead was

destroyed. Of the rubbings I did take you will see that some of the old village names

are recorded. Goode – a grandfather of the late sexton Wm. Whitlock; Goodridge – the

village blacksmith; members of the Dunckley family, who built the fine arch over the

Northampton road, as well as much other railway building. It is an ambition with many

of us also to leave “our mark” in some way or other.



I enjoy penning these history notes – I hope you enjoy reading them . . . so a

very Happy New Year to all readers!





These are reproductions of

actual rubbings taken from the

lead roof prior to the restoration

in 1960.



There must have been some

hundreds of them, each successive

generation obliterating the

previous markings.









This sketch shows the

central point and pitch of the

lead covered roof upon which the

scratch marks occurred.



I believe that all past

choir boys and girls and bell

ringers had too left their

initials. It is sad that all

have gone.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [44]



We will take yet another look at the fabric of our parish church. You

will remember that last month we dealt with the markings on the lead roof; this month

we will take a very careful look at the stonework of the outside of this old building

and see what men of former years have left behind as their “mark”.



This study of ancient markings (some would call it doodling) is now very

popular. Most of us have read, and have been very interested in the cave paintings of

Europe and Africa, and even the great stones of Stone Henge have produced, after most

careful searching, a new set of very ancient and important scratch markings. It would

certainly appear that wherever man has been he was quite capable of taking up an

implement and by inscribing and rubbing has left behind some often strange mark for

this generation to ponder over. Why not include a “scratch marking” session in your

holiday programme? I think that most of us, whether at home or away, are genuinely

interested in our ancient buildings, whether they be churches, castles or cottages.



We will begin our investigation at the low side window, now blocked up, on the

south side of the church. Here on the west jam can be seen a scratch dial measuring

approximately 3¾ inches across, and with about thirteen divisions marked off in its

lower half. There is a hole in the centre for the gnomon. Similar scratch dials can

often be found on the south side of many churches, and they are attributed to most of

the periods ranging from the Norman conquest to the reformation. The incised lines on

them were used as with a sun dial, to indicate the time of the observances of the

church services, or mass, etc. Through the restoration of many sections of our church

we have undoubtedly lost most of our ancient doodlings.



Moving towards the west, on a window pane of the window nearest the tower, is

something quite different, although a very popular way of leaving a mark. This is a

diamond cut inscription as follows:-









What prompted this James Howard in 1799 to reach up and to cut his name,

following the citation to George III which was recorded in the previous year? (At

this period in national history we were at war with France, and in our local history

the canal was completed except for the Blisworth tunnel, which was not opened until

1805.)



Other scratch markings occur on the stones of the north porch, but as this was

only built in 1607, these are not of great antiquity. A JC 1797 leaves his mark, and

there are one or two other interesting doodles thus:









What do you make of them?

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [45]





Have you ever noticed that wherever a section of an ancient church contains a

few stones of a soft nature, these stones, particularly if they are near to the porch

or main doors, are often deeply incised with round holes or elongated slots? One

pillar in our church is built of a soft sandstone, which possibly came from the

Harlestone area, and as this pillar is just inside the north door (on the right side

going in) it has a collection of these incisions. Some of them are partly covered up

by the pew fitments.



It is now widely accepted that these markings were made by parishioners of the

past in an attempt to invoke help for a sick or dying member of their households. A

hair or piece of finger nail of the sick person was taken to church, and whilst

holding the relic of the invalid, the soft stone was rubbed or scratched by a twig to

remove a small quantity of powdered stone. This was then collected and taken home

where it was either applied to the sick person externally or given as medicine. It

was then hoped that the “holy stone” powder would work a miracle cure.



There is another variation of these markings, particularly on those found on

the exterior walls and it is suggested that the militia men sharpened their swords and

knives on suitable soft stones. In Yelvertoft Church a tomb is half worn away by

supposed Cromwellian troopers who used the stone as a sharpener for their weapons.



When visiting your favourite churches this summer see how many traces of these

mutilated stones you can find, not forgetting that many were lost in restorations of

the last century.





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [46]





This month‟s history notes will be rather short, and I will make of it a little

“I Spy” game. Some-where in the church are two nicely carved stone heads, about half

life size, which could well be over 500 years old. I believe they depict a man and a

woman of around 1450. The head of the man has a hair cut in the manner of the period

(it is said that history always repeats itself, for this was a previous long hair

styling). The lady has her hair tightly drawn across her head and it is decorated

with oak leaves.

Come and wander in and out of your parish church this summer – enjoy the

details and inscriptions. It is the greatest and fullest “history book” of your

village.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [47]



MISSING





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [48]





Having introduced our intentions to survey the churchyard in last month‟s

notes, we will proceed forthwith to take a look at what is perhaps the oldest

structure of all the stones to be found within that hallowed acre.



On the north side of the church, by the path leading to the porch, are the

steps and socket stone of a churchyard Cross. It consists of a calvary of four steps,

seven feet square at the base, and terminating in a socket stone two feet square. In

1849 it was described as the remains of an ancient sepulchral cross. It is also known

that at some time a sundial was erected in the socket. This could well have been

added to replace the old Cross shaft. It is not easy to assess the age of the present

structure, but from the general style of the stones I would hazard a guess that it was

erected just after 1600, and that it replaced an earlier, probably original, Cross

which had fallen into decay by that time.



During the 6th century a decree of Justinian specified that such a cross should

precede the building of the church. Churchyard crosses continued to be erected

throughout the medieval period. Often they were used as preaching points. Many were

partly or wholly destroyed during the reformation. It was from the sixth century also

that burials in the ground attached to the church became the practice. During

medieval times our churchyards were busy places. The unused spaces were used by

travelling merchants for their booths and stalls; fairs were held, and at feast times

there would be dancing and games and “church ales”.



The following illustration shows the churchyard Cross mantled in a fall of

winter snow:-









I will close each of this series of notes with an epitaph borrowed from some

other churchyard. This one comes from Hampshire:-

“Here sleeps in peace a Hampshire Grenadier

Who caught his death by drinking cold small beer;

Soldiers, be wise from his untimely fall,

And when ye‟re hot drink strong, or none at all.”









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [49]







Yet another Feast Sunday has come and gone – they have been doing just that for

at least 800 years during the long history of our parish church. For this month‟s

history notes I will give you a “write up” by the late Rev. William Henry Barry M. A.

rector of Blisworth 1904 – 1914. I quote:-



“The Feast Week celebrations are always looked forward to in Blisworth. As is

right and fitting they commence on Sunday; the Hospital Sunday as we term it here. In

the afternoon The Children‟s Flower Service was well attended, and not withstanding

the fact that the two previous days had been wet (!) a nice number of flowers etc.

were offered, and were taken to the Hospital the next morning. The evening service

was preceded by a Church Parade of Club Members and Ambulance Men. We naturally

expect a large congregation on these occasions, and the question is not whether the

Church will be full or not but whether we can accommodate it all. The Church Officers

did their duties in a most able manner, and we trust everyone found a seat.



A nice number were present on Monday at the Feast Dinner, the Rector taking the

chair; the usual sports were held in the afternoon, which were enjoyed by a record

attendance.



These festivities should have the effect of bringing to notice the excellent

work that is being done by the societies that take part in them. The good work done

by the Ambulance men is appreciated more and more each year; and the good work of the

Club is too well known to need explanation here. But perhaps the writer may be allowed

to say two things; the first is to congratulate all those to whom the arrangements

were entrusted, and the second is to express a hope that next year the list of

apologies of absence from the dinner may not be as long. The day perhaps presented an

opportunity, perhaps unequalled in the year, of bringing people together. ON GOOD

FELLOW FEELING, AND UNITY, THE WELFARE OF THE VILLAGE AND ITS HAPPINESS LARGELY

DEPENDS. IN OUR VARIOUS GATHERINGS WE WANT NOT ONLY FINANCIAL SUPPORT, BUT THE EVEN

GREATER ENCOURAGEMENT OF PERSONAL INTEREST. In these days when there is a tendency of

class separation, everything should be done to prevent such a terrible result. And if

we may adventure an opinion, it is by joining together on such occasions as present

themselves at Feast Time a great deal may be accomplished to avert such a great

calamity.”



These words were written 56 years ago. Talk them over . . . . and who said it

NEVER rains around Blisworth Feast!!? Of course it does! And thunderstorms too!

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [50]



In the May history notes we commenced a survey of the churchyard tombs and

headstones, commencing with the old sepulchral Cross which stands beside the north

path. The next objects of size and importance in the same area are three massive

“chest tombs”. Unfortunately two of these have lost their inscriptions, but one at

least has the inscription in part:-



“Here lyeth the body of John Atkins Sen. Husband to Dorothy,

and Ann wife of . . of John . .(note this could be junior)

who was the daughter of Edward and Mary Brafield.”



This tomb dates from 1707-8 and has no other decoration. In spite of its

plainness, the dimensions of the stone slabs present a worthy memorial to the craft of

some long forgotten stone mason. This stone also tells of the importance and

affluence of these two families who were joined in marriage. Both the Atkins‟ and the

Brafields‟ names appear very many times in the church registers, but more of that at a

later date. It is more than likely that one of these two families lived in the manor

which stood on the north side of the high street and that this path to the church

would have been regularly used by them.



The old Cross base, the three chest tombs, and a number of late 17th century

head stones constitute a very interesting group of monumental craft and art. One

stone in particular (illustrated) is a very fine example of the mason‟s abilities.

The very heavy cut away of stone leaving the high relief of the “curtain swags” and

angel head, presents in its mellowed lichen covered form, a high degree of artistry.

Here again the weather and time have robbed us of the date, but it was erected

somewhere around 1600.









There is also a little gem of a stone, which by good fortune still carries its

original lettering after 289 years of exposure:-





Here lyeth Grace ye wife

of William Stauton who

died July the 31 Anno

Dom 1678

The wise mans trophy

Best her praise relates

He workes (saith he)

shall

praies her in the gates.





According to the gister the entry reads thus:-

It is interesting to note the numerous spellings in both the tomb stone

inscription and the rector‟s entry in the register: “praise” and “praies” on the

stone, whilst in the register the name is Stoulton and on the stone it is Stauton.

This casual way of recording is repeated time and again in many of the recordings,

until the late 18th century.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [51]









This month we will take a look at the group of table tombs which stand at the

east end of the church, a site favoured by the affluent through many centuries. In

the case of the present table tombs they are all to the memory of members of the once

great Brafield family who lived at Blisworth from the 16th century, reaching their

height of importance in the mid 17th century, during which time they built most of the

finest buildings in the village. I invite you to take a look at these fine yet simple

memorials; think of the work entailed in digging the stone, hewing it in the mason‟s

yard, and carving the “swags” and the masterly lettering. All credit must be handed

out to those unknown craftsmen who did such magnificent work with stone.



There are five tombs in this group, one collapsed some few years ago and has

been stacked up; yet another has subsided until only the table top is left above

ground. The remaining three are in fairly good order, although two of these have lost

their inscriptions through erosion over the past 300 years. The remaining inscription

is in superb condition and reads thus:-





HEARE:LYETH:THE BODY:OF:

JOHN;BRAFIELD;WHO;DECEAS

ED:THE:28:OF:MARCH:IN:THE:

YEARE:OF:OUR:LORD:GOD:1647.

AND ALICE HIS WIFE WHO HAD 6

SONNES & 4 DAUGHTERS. LIVED

DYED APRILL THE 28 DAY

AN.O.D.1688





We also know that one of the now lost inscriptions attracted the county

historian John Bridges, who in the 18th century documented this poignant account of

Mary Brafield and her family, which he states was to be seen on a tomb at the chancel

end of the church:-





HERE LIETH MARY THE WIFE OF JOHN BRAFIELD

THE MOTHER OF NEMEROUS PROGENYE.

TWO JOHNS, TWO WILLIAMS, MARY AND ELIZABETH.

FIVE OF THESE CHILDREN WENT TO THIS BED OF DUST

IN THE MORNING, THE MOTHER LAY DOWN TO SLEEPE AT NOONE

WITH HER 7TH UNBORN CONFINED IN HER WOMBE.

SEPT 12. ANNO AET ANNO DOM 1662.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [52]





Last month we looked at the interesting table tombs at the east end of our

church which told of numerous members of the Brafield family. No family of that name

now lives in the village, although the name is still to be found in Northamptonshire.

This month I am going to tell of a family contemporaneous with the Brafields.



Somewhere after the middle of the 16th century a family named Plowman turned up

in Blisworth. By subsequent marriage they soon established themselves and in 1587 a

wedding took place within our church between HENERIE PLOUGHMAN and MARIE ESTELL whose

family was already of importance in the village. From that day 380 years ago, I do

not think we have ever been without a Plowman by name, although until the beginning of

the 17th century it was spelt PLOUGHMAN. For the benefit of the newcomers to the

village, we still have a member of this ancient family by name, Miss Sarah Plowman,

who could well be the last of this line to dwell here, although many of our old

village families must be connected by past marriages.



By the mid 17th century the Plowman family had risen to such importance that

they took for their family burial place the very ground upon which the church stood,

even extending their graves into the chancel, the most coveted place of all.

Unfortunately these floor memorials and tablets were taken up in 1871 when the present

encaustic tiles were laid. In all probability they would have been broken up and used

as the foundation rubble for the new floor. This kind of vandalism has always been

with us. Fortunately, however, the County historian, Bridges, in the late 18th century

recorded the inscriptions from these memorials. In the north aisle he saw these

words inscribed in stone, which the proud Plowman family members must have hoped would

last for all time,





“Here lieth the body of Richard Plowman. Hee departed

this life on Feb 21 1689.”



“Here lieth the body of Richard Plowman, late husband to

Elizabeth his wife, who departed this life on the fourth day

of August 1696 in the 75th year of his age.”



“Here lieth the body of Mrs. Elizabeth Plowman, late

wife of Mr. Richard Plowman Senior, who was buried

October 24.1700 in the 77 year of her age.”







In the chancel were these memorials:-





“Here lieth Joyce the wife of William Plowman who was

buried July 22 1683.”



“Here lieth the body of William Plowman who departed this

life the first day of August in the yeare of our Lord;

1695, and in the 69 year of his age.”



“Stand still, reader, and spend a tear

Upon the dust that slumbers here;

And whilst thou read‟st the state of me,

Think on the glass that runs for thee.”









With that fine epitaph composed by William Plowman long long ago, I too

will leave you until next month to ponder. With the backing of 800 years of church

history these notes could go on for ever!!! I thoroughly enjoy writing them – I hope

you enjoy reading them. Thank you!









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [53]



We will again take a look at what Bridges (18th century historian) said about

memorials within our church (most of which have now disappeared). Besides noting the

inscriptions on the Plowman stones (see last month) he recorded the following which

were chancel burials:-



Here lieth the body of Mr. Thomas Tibbes the only

husband of Dorothy, by whom he has issue, one

sonne and one daughter;

He died the 8th day of January Anno Dom 1660





Here lieth the body of Mrs. Dorothy Tibbes, late wife

of Mr. Thomas Tibbes, who departed this life the

27th day of November 1676.

“Christos est midi vivere and mori luorum”





The inscription on Mrs. Tibbes memorial comes from the 21st verse of chapter one

of the epistle of Paul the Apostle to the Philippians, and reads thus:- “For me to

live in Christ, and to die is gain”.



I am intrigued at the wording on Mr. Tibbes‟ stone, stating that he was the

only husband of Dorothy. Does this imply that the memorials were not raised until

after the wife‟s death in 1676, sixteen years after the death of Mr. Tibbes? Was this

an outward and visible sign for all to see that Dorothy had remained a widow and true

to her first love? Or did Mr. Thomas Tibbes dictate his own inscription before he

died and so bind the widow to remain such? The register states that Mrs. Dorothy

Tibbes was of Milton at the time of her death and that she was brought to Blisworth

for her burial.



Historian Bridges also recorded that within the communion rails was a memorial

to Richard Cooke, late husband of Elizabeth his wife, who was buried Dec. 2nd 1690.

(Richard Cooke A M. was rector of Blisworth from 1630 to 1656.)



With the many alterations within the church over the past centuries it is not

surprising that the memorials of the Tibbes, Plowmans, and Cookes have disappeared.

One remnant, however, survives to the Tibbes in part, for underneath the sanctuary

carpet are to be found the remains of a stone which states:-





Here lyeth the body of Persivall Tibbes

only son of Thomas Tibbes......









To bring the record up to date I will conclude with two 19th century stone

tablets which are also under the sanctuary carpet:-



“Sacred to the memory of Mary Constable, wife of

Ald. Constable of Northampton, formerly of this place

who died Jan 14 1813. age 58 years.

“AMIABLE : PIOUS : CHARITABLE.:”

also to their infant son Phillip Constable.







“Sacred to the memory of Isiah Constable of

Fenny Stratford, who died May 23 1809 aged 31 years

“INDUSTRIOUS : HONEST : SINCERE.”

It is interesting to note that Alderman Constable, whose name was also Phillip,

was mayor of Northampton in 1810, and that he was connected with the building of the

tunnel and the canal. His name is mentioned in the minutes of the Grand Junction

Canal Company as living in a house situate on Blisworth Hill, around 1800. He was

also a prime mover in getting the branch canal out to Northampton in 1815.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [54]



It will soon be Christmas again, and many of you will participate in one or

more of the services which will be held in our parish church. The building will be

bedecked as usual with evergreens and other forms of seasonable decorations, together

with a fairly new innovation which is a large illuminated Christmas tree upon which

will hang presents brought for distribution to less fortunate children. Young and old

all love to see this gay tree.



The older worshippers will remember Christmas days of former years, when the

decorations were different. Fifty-six years ago the church was dressed up in a much

more formal manner, all the arches outlined with neat ropes of evergreen leaves, and

within the arches hung a repeat of swags and cords of evergreens. Around each pillar

was wound a neat rope of similar decoration, and on every other pew end was nailed a

decorative staff topped with a lighted candle (the rest of the church would be lit

with the existing oil lamps).



High on the walls were large stars of Bethlehem, and across the screen and the

reredos was a continuous repeat of the word “Emmanuel”...”Emmanuel”... probably in red

letters on a white background. Much of this lettering was done by the village

cobbler, Mr. John Green – of whom I will write at a later date.



In that same year the rector wrote: “The Church looked very nice on Christmas

Day, and as in former years we had carols in the evening – the ringers joining in for

the last carol (presumably on the hand bells) which always seems a happy combination

of those who call us to church and those who lead our services”. At that same

Christmas, attempts were made to exclude the cold draughts which came under the two

doors; the two curtained “inner porches” were set up, and even though we now have oil

fired central heating, we still appreciate the efforts of that entertainment committee

who, long ago, provided those curtains. The choir also gave a Christmas concert which

was enjoyed by all present. (Radio, in its present form, and television were not even

thought of in those days.



The collections too fifty years ago, make an interesting comparison. It was

not necessary to have weekly collections, often only monthly and sometimes

fortnightly. I will give them to you for December 5th, 1910 – 16/6½; December 19th -

£1.2.4½d; and for Christmas day -£2.2.0½d. Last year our Christmas Day collections

amounted to £20.15.1d. which was given to the work of the Dr. Barnardo‟s Homes. And

still we ask for more each year for such deserving causes.



Now let us slip back in years still further – to about a hundred years ago. At

this time the church was being completely re-roofed and services were not held in

church. Miss Stone, who was the squire‟s daughter, leaves us with a picture of the

Christmas Day communion service. This was held in a great barn which stood on the

opposite side of the village street (where Mr. Rivett‟s lawn now flourishes). Miss

Stone was struck by the sheer beauty of the candle lit setting, with the stars peeping

through the ill fitting doors. What a glorious setting it must have been, in all it‟s

simplicity and primitiveness – a true reminder of that first Christmas Day in the

stable at Bethlehem long, long ago.



The last section of that barn was demolished just before the turn of the last

century; Mr. F. Burbidge, who still lives nearby, well remembers its destruction. To

him, and to all readers, I would like to say:-



“HAPPY CHRISTMAS!”

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [55]





The first of these church history notes appeared in the June 1963 edition of

the Blisworth Church News Sheet, a publication which in itself was church history, for

such a news sheet had never before been printed for total house to house consumption

within the village of Blisworth.



The rector and Mrs. Bunker were at the time temporarily housed in the “Rectory

Cottage” in Gayton road which cottage incidentally was erected for the gardener to a

late rector way back in the latter half of the last century. Not only did that past

rector have a gardener, but he had a large household staff, a groom, and at one time a

carriage horse, and six hunters with which the family hunted with the Grafton Hunt.



But to come back to church history. This month I only intend to re-cap on what

we have already studied – this mainly for the benefit of the many newcomers to

Blisworth over the past four years. We began with the building of the early church

somewhere in the 13th century, and the enlarging in the early 14th century. The tower

was added a little later.



During the long life of the church, much has been changed; windows became

enlarged, tombs were added (and later taken out) as were the box pews and the gallery

from the west end of the church. Within the past hundred years the organ has been

installed and some of the stained glass windows. We have only one small section of

medieval glass, this being in the north side window of the chancel. Many sections of

the walls have been rebuilt, and not very long ago the extensive rebuilding of the

tower took all our cash. There is always a list of jobs to be done, as and when cash

is in hand, as also there are many jobs for the willing volunteers. The last

decorating job to be done was the re-painting of the clock face.



The bells which were rung after a long silence this Christmas, were hung in

their present frame in 1624, and from then on the bells were cast in 1663, 1713, and

1758. All of the bells are inscribed with the names of either the wardens of the day

or the actual bell founders who cast them; some of them also carry inscriptions in

Latin.



We have a fine collection of silver plate, the oldest piece being a small

chalice which was made around the year 1570. The latest addition is a fine silver

salver which was given to the church last year. Our windows are of interest,

particularly the two blocked up low side windows. The fine 15th century rood screen is

worth a second look, as are the numerous wall monuments and the fine table tomb of

Roger Wake (1505).



If you are a newcomer to the village we welcome you to come and look around our

fine old church, and if you are interested in what has been written, past copies of

the News Sheet can, I feel certain, be produced for your reading. Perhaps some of our

regulars have spare copies which they would be prepared to hand back as library

copies? In which case I will be pleased to receive them.



Next month we will continue with our “tour” of the churchyard monuments.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [56]





Our previous surveys of the churchyard have taken us to the late 18th century,

during which times stones were only erected to the very rich members of our village

community. From then on, with the rise of industry and a new approach to agriculture,

a new middle class evolved, and many more headstones were subsequently erected, but

much of the former artistry and craftsmanship was lost to a new set of highly

commercial stone carvers, who established themselves near to the great new burial

grounds on the outskirts of the towns. It was from these “modern” shops that the

great output of white marble headstones poured during the past one hundred years.



For the first half of the 19th century our churchyard was filling up fast, and

in 1863 the new cemetery was opened. It is to that period, 1800-1863, that most of

the existing headstones which occupy the western end of the church grave yard belong,

and many of them carry the familiar names of local farmers and industrialists of that

and later times...Gudgeon, Cave, Worster, Stubbs, Westley, Roper, Dunkley, etc. Some

of the members of the families subsequently became the veritable “corner stones” of

the Baptist church, and were in turn buried in the burial ground attached to the

Baptist buildings.



With the modern approach to cremations, it would appear that within a life-time

village burials could become a thing of the past. It is interesting to note that the

first “proper” cremation to be carried out in this country (after a lapse of 1100

years was at WOKING only 83 years ago.



During the early times the very poor would use the “parish coffin” placed upon

the parish bier. This being used to take the deceased to the churchyard, but for the

burial the body would be taken out of the coffin and buried direct in the ground. To

give impetus to the wool trade, an act was passed in 1678 forbidding anyone, under a

penalty of £5, to be buried, unless they were wrapped in a woollen garment. This act

was only repealed in 1885.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [57]





For the next few months we shall be taking a look at the long list of names of

our past rectors. Added to these names will be a few general historic notes of the

times in which they lived. Supporting this list of rectors will be the names of their

patrons.



The patrons were the people who were entitled to select and appoint a rector of

their choice to the living of the church. This system, still in general use today, is

an ancient one stemming from the early days when the lord of the manor built a small

church next to his house or castle for his own private use. With the growth of the

local population around the manor, so too the church was enlarged to cope with the

ever growing attendance of the parishioners, until we arrive at the present stage of

what we refer to as our parish church. The priest in those early days was, in other

words, simply a private chaplain to his overlord and his household, with a few

domestic chores thrown in, such as educating the children etc.



As we progress through the long list of names since the year 1226, we shall see

many changes in both rectors and patrons, often brought about by wars, political,

hereditary, or religious changes. Livings were also bought and sold. This practise

was terminated in this century.



The greater majority of present livings (or advowsons) are in the hands of

private persons; the rest are under the patronage of the bishops, deans and chapters,

universities, trusts, or the crown. The living at Blisworth now belongs to the

Martyrs Memorial Trust.



Our old list of rector‟s names had fifty-one entries and had become filled, the

last entry being George Hall Mallett, M.A., who died at Blisworth in 1939. Last year

a new list was written, thus bringing the record up to date, as well as allowing space

for future additions. This copying was the work of Mrs. J. Percival, and by an odd

coincidence both the old and the new lists were written in the same house over a space

of some seventy years. The old list was the work of Mr. John Green (village cobbler)

born 1843, died 1918, and who lived at No. 20 Stoke Road, where Mr. & Mrs. J. Percival

and their family now live.





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [58]





The advowson (or living) of Blisworth church, and the Right of Presentation, was

granted to WILLIAM Briwerre by the Earl of Derby and confirmed by King John in the

year 1199. On the death of Joan Briwerre, who was presumably the widow of the

aforesaid William, the advowson and the manor passed to Sir William Wake. From that

time onwards up to the year 1521, the advowson continued in an in-and-out manner in

the hands of the Wake family.



Our first recorded rector heads the list simply as “JOHN.....”, this was in the

year 1226. Henry III was king, having already occupied the throne for ten years since

he was nine years old. 1226 was also the year in which the deputies handed over the

total reigns of Government to Henry III. Some records speak of Henry III as being a

failure during his long kingship, but it is worth noting that he was probably the

greatest of all patrons of medieval ecclesiastical architecture. Our own parish

church was built during the last years of his reign 1216-1272.



Quite often I am asked “Is your village parson a rector or a vicar?”. To which

I reply “rector”. Nowadays there is no difference between a rector and a vicar, and

where new parish churches are built you will always find a “vicar”; rectors are only

to be found in older churches. Originally a rector (one who has the Rule) collected

tithes from land belonging to him by virtue of his office, and he sometimes had a

number of churches in his care to which he appointed (and paid for) vicars – the word

„vicar” meaning “a deputy”.

And what is a tithe? It is an ancient term from the Saxon days meaning “a

tenth part”. Prior to 1808 the rectors of Blisworth were entitled to a tenth part of

all the products from the 313 acres of glebe land then held by them – the word “glebe”

meaning “The land belonging to a parish church or ecclesiastical benefice”.

Having made a start with the first known rector – JOHN..... in the year 1226, together

with a few necessary explanations – we will now be able to proceed next month with the

second known rector, plus a few contemporaneous historic notes.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [59]





The second recorded rector of Blisworth was instituted on June 16th in the year

1272; his name was William de Lubenham, and his patron was Baldwin Wake, a member of

the illustrious family who were overlords of Blisworth for some three hundred years.



A new king, Edward the First, also ascended the throne in this same year. Our

parish church at this time would have been much smaller than the present building,

about half as long, and without the north aisle and the tower. The rector‟s name is

of interest, for here we have an example of a surname taken from the village of

Lubenham near to Market Harborough. This new rector would in all probability have

been the third or fourth generation to hold this name, for most people have adopted

their surnames by now, mostly from trade, or from a common object around them. It was

only a very limited number of overlords who took for their name that of the village

from which they came, or were born.



Although we do not know much of the history of the church at this period, there

is one item which tells of the exploits of the son of a parson at Blisworth, and it

happened around the year 1272. On Wednesday, the feast of St. Bartholomew some

thirteen local lads, which included Roger, Ralph and Thurston, the sons of John of

Hanslope, together with the Blisworth rector‟s son, rode over to the royal forest at

Rockingham, and there they hunted with bows and arrows all day, killing three deer.

They were finally disturbed by the royal foresters, but they managed to flee, carrying

their kill. On arrival at Hanslope the venison was divided up and eaten. The name of

the Blisworth “poacher” was Henry.



And what happened to Henry? I am sorry that I cannot complete my story. It

would certainly appear that he and the others were accused of the offence, otherwise

it would not have been put on record on the “eyre rolls”. These “court rolls” as they

were generally named, were the method of documenting all legal proceedings over

hundreds of years, and as their name implies they were parchment documents joined

together to ultimately form a “roll” of great length.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [60]



The Year A.D. 1303



On November 12th in 1303, the third recorded rector of Blisworth was instituted,

but his stay in Blisworth was not to be a long one, for he was “replaced” on February

24th in the following year, 1304. The reasons for such a rapid change are not

recorded, but the following notes give a little explanation.



It would appear that the institution of William of Estcheap, for that was the

rector‟s name, was the choice of John, Lord Wake, who was yet another lord of

Blisworth of the family Wake. This said John, Lord Wake, however died on April 4th,

1304, leaving an only child, a young daughter, as heiress to the estates which

included the patronage of Blisworth. At this stage King Edward I stepped in as the

custodian of the patronage, which act is recorded thus:- “Edward I as custodian of the

heir of John Wake deceased”. This patronage did not return into the hands of the Wake

family until the year 1336 (but more of that in subsequent notes).



The Year A.D 1304

This year saw the fourth recorded rector of Blisworth, John de Suthorp,

instituted on February 24th, 1304. His patron is not named, but it could still have

been the ageing Edward I. This John de Suthorp, however lived to see the death of

Edward I, who died in the year 1307 aged 68 years, having reigned for thirty-five

years – not a bad run for the times.



This king married twice; he had three sons and five daughters by his first

wife, and two sons and one daughter by his second wife. John de Suthorp our rector,

could well have journeyed up to London to see his patron buried at Westminster. He

too was not to remain as rector of Blisworth for long, for he died two years later in

the year 1309.





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [61]



MISSING







THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [62]





For this month‟s note we will take a look at the 5th and 6th recorded rectors of

Blisworth. The years covered by their office were from 1309 to 1317. In the June

notes we saw how King Edward I became the custodian of the patronage owing to the

death of John Lord Wake, whose daughter, the heiress to the patronage, was a child at

the time.



On November 9th, 1309, Will Ayremine was instituted at Blisworth, his

predecessor having died in the February of the same year. His stay as rector of

Blisworth was not to be a long term one, for four years later, in 1313, he resigned.



This brings us quickly to the 6th recorded rector whose name was Adam de

Ayremine and who was instituted on the 16th day of July 1313. This Adam could well

have been a brother or son of the former Will Ayremine, but he was not to be rector of

Blisworth for long, he too resigned four years later 1n 1317. Nothing further is

known of these two rectors named Ayremine. Could they have resigned because of the

troubled political times?



The patron of these two men was the new King Edward II, who ascended the throne

in 1307. His wife was Isabella of France, and they had two sons and two daughters.

Some historians picture Edward II as a feeble and perverted man, that he was no better

as a statesman than he was as a soldier. He lost the battle of Bannockburn in 1314 to

Robert the Bruce, was deserted by his Queen, abdicated in favour of his son, became

imprisoned, and finally murdered at Berkely Castle in Gloucestershire in 1327.



During the reigns of Edward II (and later Edward III) there was terrible

distress in the land. Men‟s minds were more occupied with foreign wars than the

conditions at home, the Church, too, was greatly weakened and did not recover for very



many years. Such were the fractious surroundings of our 5th and 6th recorded rectors.

Next month we will move on to the next in line.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [63]



MISSING





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [64]



MISSING





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [65]





If we refer back to last month‟s notes we will see that our tenth recorded

rector was Thomas Foxe and that he vacated the living at Blisworth in 1386. Could he

have been related to John Fox, Mayor of Northampton in 1384, 1392, 1399,and 1400?

(the „e‟ after Foxe is incidental).



To have vacated the living could have meant that he was unpopular, for although

we know next to nothing about our rector in 1386, we do know something about his

namesake in Northampton.



John Fox, Mayor of Northampton was a lollard. This rising set was fast

becoming an embarrassment to the government. One incident is recorded relating to

Northampton, and the Mayor was certainly guilty of some of the unwarrantable

proceedings. One day as the priest of All Saints church was about to proceed to the

altar to sing his mass, The Mayor took hold of his vestments and held him until a

lollard ascended the pulpit and preached to the congregation. This procedure took

place again in the afternoon, but not without a series of disturbances. The Mayor was

duly reported to the King and the Council. During the reign of King Richard II, 1377

to 1400, Both parliament and convocation took steps to stop the lollards. In later

years numerous members were burnt at the stake. The year 1380 also saw the last of

the parliament assemblies at Northampton.



Our eleventh rector was Henry Welde who was instituted in December 1386, and

resigned in 1398. There also appears a change in the patronage, for Thomas de

Hollands, earl of Kent, appears on the scene. Actually the advowsen was still in the

Wake family for Joane Wake, heir to the family fortunes, much of which was at

Blisworth, took for herself three husbands in this order:-





Number One – The Earl of Salisbury



Number Two – Sir Thomas Holland, Kt. Earl of Kent

(Our patron for a time)



Number Three – Edward, Prince of Wales,

son and heir apparent to King Edward III









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [66]



MISSING

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [67]





On January 1st, 547 years ago, the people of this village saw the induction of

their 19th recorded rector, William Mounceaux, who stayed at Blisworth for the next ten

years. (Last month you will remember we read of the previous seven rectors inducted

within the space of seventeen years.)



Apart from our present church, no other building seems to have survived from

that period. The manor was occupied by members of the Wake family, who were

presumably the patrons of the living. In 1422 Henry VI made his entry into history by

becoming King of England. He was destined to reign for the next forty years. During

this time there was a reasonable peace between the Church and State although the tide

of opposition to Rome was rising steadily. The plain men of our countryside were also

denouncing the poverty of the parishes, the idleness of the friars, the luxury of the

monks, and the absence of the supposed resident priests. I wonder if our William

Mounceaux was an absentee?



No man‟s life was safe while the “War of the Roses” spread over the land, and

in country districts the power of the Church had sunk very low. Men seemed to do

whatever they liked without control of law or religion.



In 1432 William Mounceaux evidently decided that ten years was long enough to

be at Blisworth for it is recorded that he exchanged his living with that of John

Parmenter (or Parmynter) who became the 20th recorded rector on February 18th, 1432.

This new John likewise did a “swap” eight years later with a Reginald Newton who was

inducted on March 4th, 1439/40, and who remained at Blisworth until 1446.



Nothing is known of the living quarters of these rectors, but from

contemporaneous records they would have been well housed. An Essex vicarage of this

period had “one hall with two chambers annexed, a bake house, kitchen and larder

house, one chamber for his servant, stable and a hay sollar, with one competent

garden”, not to mention a brew house. From an inventory of the contents of a

parsonage kitchen we find that it was stocked with the following items:- “Eight bacon

flitches, a little brewing lead, three brass pots, three kettles, one posnett, one

frying knife, a skimmer, one fire rake, a pot hanger, one pot-hooke, one andiron,

three spits, one gridiron, one firepan, a coal rake or iron, two botts, three wooden

platters, six boldishes, three forms, two stools, seven platters, two pewter dishes,

four saucers, a covering of a saltseller, a podynger, seven tubbs, a cauldron, two

syffs, a capon cope, a mustard quern, a ladder , two pails, and one beehive”.



It is just possible that William Mounceaux forgot to say “Happy New Year”, but

547 years later I am pleased to say “Happy New Year to all Readers – Carry on

Blisworth”.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [68]





February 1st, 1446 saw the induction of Richard Manning S.T.P. It is of

note that this 22nd recorded rector of Blisworth was the first to carry the distinction

of a degree – on the records are the letters S.T.P. standing for Sacrae Theologiae

Professor, (Professor of Divinity, the old form of D.D.). His patron was Henry Grey,

Earl of Tankerville. The manor of Blisworth was still in the hands of the Wake

family, the lord at this time being Thomas Wake, the second of three generations to be

named Thomas. His grandson Roger was later to be buried in the fine and only

remaining Wake tomb in our church. Like many of his predecessors, Richard Manning

S.T.P. soon departed from Blisworth, to be quickly followed by Phillip Long in 1448,

thus becoming our 23rd recorded rector. Political reasons must have been the main

cause for these many quick “changes” of our rectors. Within a year Phillip Long soon

departed from Blisworth, for a new name appears on the induction list in June 1449,

William Elmsale A.M. (Number 24 on the list).



England was in turmoil; France had been lost except for Calais. Henry VI

succumbed to a temporary madness in 1454, which was hereditary in his mother‟s line.

Hostilities too broke out between the families of Lancaster and York. In June 1460

the Rev. William Elmsale, together with the people of Blisworth saw an extraordinary

procession of men passing through the village. They had come via Towcester, and

camped near to Danes Camp overlooking Northampton. These men were the rebel earls and

their retainers who were looking for battle with Henry VI. Henry, having previously

heard that the Yorkists were marching on to Northampton, was already there to meet

them. He considered himself strong enough to meet any force that the rebel earls

could bring against him, and he foolishly moved out of his strong position in the

town. He pitched his camp just outside the walls, in the meadows between Delapre

Abbey(a nunnery) and the river. The position chosen proved a disastrous one for the

battle which began about two o‟clock was decided in half an hour. (It also rained

heavily.) The King was taken prisoner and led into Northampton, “with processyone,

wher he rested hym three days and thenne came to London, the 16th day of the month

aforsaid”. He was thrown into the Tower, and in the following year deposed.



Quite soon afterwards William Elmsale, 24th Rector of Blisworth, also departed

from the village. What a pity that he had not left behind a diary of what he and the

people of Blisworth had seen during his 13 years at Blisworth, 1449 – 1462.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [69]





We have now come to the year 1462 on our list of past rectors. The Wake family

were still firmly entrenched in the manor at Blisworth, and it comes as no surprise to

find that our 25th recorded rector was a member of that illustrious family. Richard

Wake was inducted on March 31st, 1462. Political turmoil was still running rife

throughout the land; Henry VI was temporarily out of power, and the new king was

Edward IV who, on May 1st, 1464, brought this area into the history books. Richard

Wake must have been fully aware of these developments, probably to his embarrassment

as we shall subsequently find.



We will now move out to Grafton (Regis) where lived Sir Richard Woodville and

his wife (formerly the Duchess of Bedford) together with his several children. The

eldest daughter Elizabeth had married Sir John Gray, who died of battle wounds shortly

after the second battle of St. Albans (1461). His young and beautiful) widow was then

obliged to return to her paternal home at Grafton (Regis). Edward IV a great hunter

of the chase, visited Whittlebury Forest in 1464, and legend tells of his meeting

“pretty young Elizabeth” in the forest in the shade of an oak tree standing in the

direct track of communication between Grafton House and Whittlebury Forest. It was

certainly love at first sight, for Edward IV “saw her home” and on May 1st, 1464, they

were privately married at Grafton, which news was not exactly popular with many when

it became known. From this union came two sons and seven daughters.



Whisperings soon followed which alleged that the Duchess of Bedford had

contrived by witchcraft to fix the meeting of her daughter with the King, and it fell

to the lot of Thomas Wake “ „Sqier” of Blisworth to lay such evidence before his King

at Warwick. The accusation was that an “ymage of led” purporting to be made by the

Duchess was found in the possession of “oon John Daunger, parish clerk of Stoke

Brewere (Stoke Bruerne), and that by means of it the Duchess of Bedford had fixed the

love of the King on her daughter.” The tangible evidence taken to the King by Thomas

Wake Esquire was described as “a image of lede made like a man of arms, contaynyng the

lengthe of a mannes fynger, and broken in the mydded, and made fast with a wyre”,

saying it was made by the Duchess to use with witchcraft and sorcery. The Duchess was

cleared of all charges made against her.



I wonder if our past rector was instrumental in exposing this “little bit of

witchcraft”, and even though the “image of lede” does not survive, the “Queens‟s Oak”

can still be seen, or what is left of it. I quite envy my past counterpart, John

Daunger, parish clerk, and his involvement in such a royal scandal. And what happened

to our rector? Why, he was to stay as our parson for ten years until 1472.



(A delightful painted triptych, reputed to be of Edward IV and Elizabeth, can

be seen in the Northampton Guildhall Road Museum and Art Gallery.)

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [70]



Last month we dealt with our 25th recorded rector, and the Wake family members

who were involved in that little bit of local witchcraft. This month we will take a

look at our 26th and 27th rectors.



Rector No. 26 was the Rev. Robert Barker, but whereas his predecessor had

stayed on at Blisworth for thirteen years, Robert Barker only stayed for one year,

1471-1472. His patron was George, Duke of Clarence.



There had been a brief change of kingship, for Henry VI staged a come-back to

the throne during 1470-1471, but later in 1471 Edward IV took over the kingship of the

country, and by 1473 we again had a new rector, John Palady L.L.B.



Also at this same time of political and Church changes, Thomas Wake Esq. (born

1434) and lord of the manor of Blisworth, regained the family patronage of the living

of Blisworth church. It was he, Thomas Wake, who nominated John Palady. This 27th

rector remained at Blisworth until around 1484, and it can well be assumed that he

conducted the burial service of his patron, Thomas Wake Esq., who died in May 1476 and

was buried at Blisworth.



Edward IV died suddenly in 1483 to be succeeded by twelve year old Edward V,

whose very wicked uncle, Richard, Duke of Gloucester, soon had the boy king seized

from his mother‟s family (the Woodvilles of Grafton Regis, see last month‟s notes).

He had him despatched to the Tower of London, where later Edward‟s younger brother

Richard was also sent to keep his brother company. The reason for this imprisonment

was on the grounds that the marriage of Elizabeth Woodville with Edward IV had been

invalid, and that therefore the children of the marriage were illegitimate.

Gloucester then seized the throne as Richard III.



The story of the probable murder of the two children in the Tower is well

known. In 1674 the skeletons of two children were discovered at the Tower and were

subsequently interred in Westminster Abbey.



One might ask why I have mentioned our English kings during these history

notes, together with patrons and rectors. As the Wake family had at times prior to

1500 intermarried with royalty and people in high places, so, too they were the

patrons, directly or indirectly, of our church and were responsible for our rectors

for some three hundred years. The sands of time were however, fast running out for

the resident lords of the manor and next month we shall deal with the closing chapters

of their domicile at Blisworth.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [71]



Last month I mentioned the death of Thomas Wake, Esq., lord of the manor of

Blisworth and patron of the living of Blisworth church. During his lifetime he rose

to be a member of the council of state, and privy chamber to King Edward IV. He died

in 1476 and was buried at Blisworth. Our 27th recorded rector, John Palady L.L.B. was

the rector at that time, and seemingly he remained as such until 1485.



On the death of Thomas Wake, his eldest son Roger (known to many of you by the

current reproductions* of him which have been “taken” from the brass of his tomb which

is in our church) became heir to his late father‟s estates and manor of Blisworth. He

also became patron of the living of our church. He was married to Elizabeth the

eldest daughter of William Catesby of Ashby St. Ledgers, and this union produced seven

sons and three daughters. Roger was presumably a friend and supporter of the Duke of

Gloucester, who in 1483 seized the throne of England and became Richard III. Roger

Wake‟s future must have looked very “rosy”, and in the following year he was appointed

Sherriff of Northamptonshire.



Meanwhile the exiled Henry of Richmond was gathering a small army together in

Brittany, comprised mainly of veteran Lancastrians who were anxious to dethrone

Richard III. This little army crossed the sea and landed at Milford Haven on August

7th, 1485, and moved inland. By August 21st they had reached Market Bosworth in

Leicestershire where the last battle of the “war of the roses” was fought. Richard

III was killed and Richmond became King Henry VII. Roger Wake, together with his

little band of Blisworth men, must have returned home very crestfallen, and many must

have been the stories of battle told over the hearth fires at Blisworth for years to

come. The new king confiscated the manor and lands at Blisworth as punishment for

Roger‟s support of the ill-fated Richard III, but probably because of the Wake

family‟s good past record, Roger Wake regained his lands and manor in 1487 by act of

parliament. Approximately 4½ months before the

Battle of Bosworth Field, Roger

Wake had appointed a new rector of

Blisworth, John Dee, who on April

4th, 1485 became our 28th recorded

rector.



Either at this time, or

when he had been Sheriff of

Northamptonshire, Roger Wake

founded his Endowed Free School

at Blisworth – a foundation which

continued until 1910.



Next month should bring us

to the end of the nearly three

hundred years of overrule of the

Wake families as lords of the manor

of Blisworth, but meanwhile, Roger

continues as a favourite “pin-up”

boy, as a reminder of those days

of Blisworth nearly five hundred

years ago.

[* Reproduced by the Pondbank Gallery.

Robin Freeston, Transcriber]









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [72]



Last month we met John Dee, our 28th recorded rector, who came to Blisworth just

before the tragic downfall of his patron, Roger Wake, Esq., in 1485. During the

following years he would have shared with the Wake family their sorrows, and later

their joys with the restoration of the manor and lands at Blisworth. He, too, would

have had daily visits to the colourful church with its newly erected rood screen and

rood loft.



So, too he would have talked with Roger Wake about the new school which was

being planned for the village, which was to be called “The Roger Wake Chantry and Free

School” with the foundation as follows:-



“To maytayne one Prieste, being an undergraduate of Oxford, as

well to pray for the soul of the Most Noble King Henry VII,

and for the souls of the founder and his family, and also to

kepe a Fre Grammar Schole for ALL that should repayre thither.”



Roger Wake died in March 1504 and was duly buried at Blisworth. His funeral

could well have been the last burial conducted at Blisworth by the Rev. John Dee for

on the death of her husband, Elizabeth Wake, Lady of Blisworth, became the patron of

the living, and in May 1504 she appointed a new rector, the Rev. John Robard, who thus

became our 29th recorded rector. Elizabeth Wake soon remarried, taking for her second

husband Sir Percy Grey, the 4th son of the Marquis of Dorset. The patronage changed

hands in 1517 when Sir John Grey took over . . . this could have meant that Elizabeth

had died and that her husband had inherited the living. When Elizabeth remarried, her

son Thomas Wake, became the new lord of the manor, but this Thomas became a man of

irregular living and was soon in serious trouble, which resulted in his imprisonment

in the Tower of London. Fortunately for him his mother was influential in high places

and obtained his release, and in all probability Thomas returned home.



After the family‟s past record of three hundred years in connection with

Blisworth it must have come as a shock to many when in 1522-3, Thomas Wake sold the

manor and lands to Sir Richard Knightley of Fawsley. Co-incident with the change in

patronage in 1517, we also had a new rector, Thomas Yford (or Isood) who was inducted

on November 8th, 1517, and who remained at Blisworth until his death in 1521, a year

before the sale of the manor.



And what have we still to remind

us of that great family and their

occupation at Blisworth? Perhaps the

best known memorial is the fine tomb

erected to the memory of Roger and

Elizabeth Wake together with their

seven sons and three daughters. The

chapel in which the tomb stands is also

attributed to the Wake family, as are

certain other church features. Their

endowed school lasted right up to 1910.



Looking northward from the manor

they would have seen the large manor

fish pond which also served the water

mill. This ancient site is soon to be

built upon. The family still lives on

at Courteenhall headed by Sir Hereward

Wake, Bart.

[The Wake tomb seen in the illustration as positioned on the south wall is now

repositioned on the east wall.] [Transcriber]









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [73]





Last month we saw the end of the three hundred years Wake family life at

Blisworth, with the sale of the manor and lands to Sir Richard Knightly of Fawsley in

1522. Our thirtieth rector died in 1521 and it is not known what happened then to the

manor house during the next years, nor do we know why there is a gap in the list of

rectors until 1535. The village seems to have undergone a complete change with the

departing of a resident lord of the manor.



We do know that the Wake endowed school was well established and that the

school master was also a priest, who could well have been called upon to take church

services over the period of fourteen years. The realms of kingship had also undergone

changes, for Henry VII had died in 1509, followed by Henry VIII, who was to reign for

the next thirty eight years.



Henry VIII, to say the least, had a very colourful life, marrying six times,

yet only five children stemmed from those marriages. He ended financial and legal

ties with foreign powers. He broke with Rome. He assumed to himself the title of

Protector and Supreme Head of the Church and Clergy of England, and by royal

proclamation a large copy of the newly translated Bible was ordered to be placed in

every church. A great navy was formed and Portsmouth was developed as a dockyard.



During this period our thirtieth rector was Thomas Yfor who was instituted on

November 8th, 1517, and died in 1521. Then followed a period of fourteen years during

which no rector‟s name appears. Sir William Barlo was inducted in 1535 to become our

31st rector, and he remained at Blisworth until his death in 1541. The patron of these

two rectors was Sir John Grey Kt., who was the second husband of Elizabeth Wake.



+ + + + + + +



With the fast growing village, it is quite likely that many readers have been

quite unaware that we have just witnessed yet another “Blisworth Feast” go by. Our

parish church is dedicated to St. John the Baptist whose birthday was celebrated on

June 24th.



For seven hundred years or so the villagers have marked this patronal festival

with thanksgivings and festivities. I do hope that parents, teachers, and old and new

residents alike, will continue to uphold this time of traditional acknowledgement of

our patron saint and church.



Times have changed from the great days when the “Feast” was to many the only

holiday of the year. First and foremost was the Church Parade made up of all the

village organisations then in being. Feast Monday was then kept as a school holiday

and a day of sport and tea parties, with a mammoth “Club” dinner at night, at which

vast amounts of meat and ales were consumed.



Customs die hard, for again this year “Feast Week” was marked by the communion

service on St. John‟s Day, special services on the following Sunday at which our youth

organisations paraded, the “little” garden party, and a visit of a fun fair complete

with “flying chairs”. In past years the first sight and sound of the great fun fairs

which visited the village was something never to be forgotten – the steam wagons

pulling the trailers containing the galloping horse roundabouts, and difficult

negotiations of all attendant vehicles into the chosen site.



Long may the Feast Week traditions live – they are part of our heritage.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [74]





We have arrived at our 31st recorded rector, Sir William Barlo, who was inducted

in 1535 and remained until his death in 1542. His patron was John Grey Kt., although

the manor had passed into the possession of Edmund Knyghtly Kt.



Henry VIII was on the throne and great changes were to follow.



In the sixteenth century many of the interesting events of Northamptonshire

history were connected with religion rather than with politics. During the sixteenth

and seventeenth centuries Northamptonshire was strongly Puritan.



On the death of the Rev. William Barlo, Edmund Knyghtly became patron although

he lived at Fawsley. (We had become a village without a resident lord of the manor.)

The new rector was Bartholomew Williamson who, as our thirty second recorded rector,

was inducted in February 1541 but died in 1544.



During this period we know that the Endowed Village School was well

established, and that the church contained many images and altars. To keep the

candles burning in the church, many residents left articles or money.



By their wills we know that:-



William Denton bequeathed “a scheepe to ye lyghte before our Lady.”

Elizabeth Tymys left “a Stryke of Barle” for the same light.

Richard Denton left “a pounde of wax (bees wax) for a light, and in 1526

William Water requested in his will that his wife should provide “a lighte

to burn at all service tyme on Sundaies and holidaes whilst she liveth”.



Henry VIII was busy too with the dissolution of the monastries, and he was soon

to lay hands on the advowson at Blisworth.





THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [75]





Following the death of our thirty-second rector in 1544, the new Rector William

Boyro was inducted on May 16th, 1544.



It was a time of great changes following the reformation, and at some time

between the years 1544 and 1547 our new patron was none other than Henry VIII in

person. It is interesting to note that Henry, who was to marry six times, strongly

disapproved of clergy being allowed to marry because he feared that they would have

too many children and the cost of upkeep would be too great. Henry VIII died in 1547,

and whether married or not, our own rector William Boyro remained in office until 1554

when he made village history by being deprived of his living. Unfortunately it is not

known why he was “sacked”.



The new king was the nine-year-old Edward VI who, under the guidance of

Archbishop Cranmer, proceeded at once to further the religious revolution. Cranmer‟s

beautifully written book of common prayer (1549) was introduced to bring uniformity of

worship and turned England into a protestant state. Unfortunately, during the six

years of his reign the country was badly mismanaged and the Church was in chaos. Poor

Edward died of consumption in the seventh year of his reign (1553).



Queen Mary I ascended the throne in 1553 and great changes again swept through

the Church. Mary was a devout catholic and, although continually pressed to do so,

she had steadfastly refused to forsake her religion. In 1554 the new queen became our

new patron, and here we see, in all probability, why our thirty-third rector was

dismissed – he refused to conform? (In the next three years some 277 bishops and

other clergy were burnt at the stake.)



The queen‟s appointment of a new rector for Blisworth was on October 18th, 1554.

Roger Bramhall S.T.D. – but he too evidently could not stand the new system for he

vacated the living within a year, in 1555. The next rector appointed in 1555 was

Robert Reynolds, L.L.D. who remained at Blisworth until 1557-58, when it is recorded

that he resigned.



Mary I (“Bloody” Mary), having married Phillip II of Spain, died childless in 1558 at

the age of 42.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [76]





Last month we arrived at the entry recording our 35th rector, Robert Reynolds,

1555-1557, whose patrons were jointly Phillip and Mary. I find, though, that I am

rather running ahead too fast thereby missing one or two rather important points from

this period and which affected Blisworth. So we will go back again to where Henry

VIII suppressed the religious houses of England and appropriated their possessions.



Henry also took many of the silver vessels from the parish churches, which must

have included Blisworth, for all our communion plate is of post reformation date.

When many of the incumbents and churchwardens at that time found how things were

going, they too also began to dispose of church plate (which according to one writer

has been merrily proceeding ever since.) There are records where churches were

represented as having been broken into and their plate stolen, no doubt in many cases

this was only a pretence to account for the disappearance of the silver which had thus

been alienated.



During the past years numerous early pieces of church plate have been found

having perhaps been buried or hidden during these troublesome times. Again in 1552

King Edward (Henry VIII‟s son) gave orders to make an inventory of the remaining

Church goods, and he too proceeded to take what pieces he needed for his own use.

He conveniently called these “broken plate” but they were carried away to his jewel

house. He did however, order that the commissioners were to leave “one, two or more

chalices or cuppes according to the multitude of the people”.



From “Blissworthe” he confiscated “one Chalice wayenge XI ownces”. His job was

well done, for from the thousands of fine silver plate, etc. existing in

Northamptonshire up to the reformation, only one small piece has survived within a

church, this being a paten of silver made in the early 14th century and is at Welford.

At this time too the king ordered that “all monuments of feigned miracles,

pilgrimages, idolatory, and superstition” were to be destroyed. All chalices coming

under this heading were melted down and refashioned into communion cups of a common

shape which are found all over England.



There seems to have been no record of our own plate at this time, although in

1528 Emma Wake had willed “I gyve to the towne of Blysworth to the use of Godds

service to be mayntained within the said church a chales with a paten” – this could

well have been the chalice mentioned earlier in this note, and which was confiscated

by Edward VI. Of the pre-reformation images etc. the following are recorded as being

within our church:-



Our Lady on the Pillar on the north side

The Trinity . . .The Father in Heaven . . . St. Catherine

St. Christopher . . .St. Francis . . . St. John the Baptist

St. Margaret . . . St. Michael . . .St. Roch . . . St. Sonday

St. Sythe . . .The Rood . . .The Sepulchre . . . etc.



Seemingly these were all destroyed and removed during the years of the

reformation, and it was through these troublesome times that our rectors came and went

in rather quick time.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [77]





In the September notes we had arrived at our thirty-fourth rector, and in the

October notes I referred to the church plate and other adornments of our church prior

to the reformation.



During the same period a complete new innovation also entered into the affairs

of the Church. In 1535, when William Barlo was our thirty-first rector, Henry VIII

appointed Thomas Lord Cromwell to be his Vicar General. Three years after this

appointment, Cromwell issued an injunction that a “book” and a coffer with two locks

should be provided for each parish in England and Wales, and the parson of the parish

was ordered to write down every Sunday in the presence of the churchwardens (or one of

them) and record in the book all the baptisms, marriages, and burials of the

immediately preceding week. In the case of neglect a fine of three shillings and

four-pence was imposed, to be applied to the repair of the church.



Thus was born a continuous document which is still very much in force today –

the Parish Register – a series of books recording the births, marriages and deaths of

the village inhabitants. In the case of Blisworth we have a continuous record from

the year 1545. Owing to the damaged condition of the parchment pages of volume one,

it is not easy to read the entries until the year 1557, which brings us to our thirty-

fifth Rector, Robert Reynolds, L.L.D. 1555 to 1558.



It is also at this period of entries that we begin to link that dim past with

our present day village, for in those early entries appear many names which are still

to be found in and around the villages of this area i.e JOHANNUS GIBBES, GILBERTUS

ABBAT, GUILIELMUS PERKINS, etc. We will deal fully with our Parish Registers at a

later date.



Our thirty-sixth rector was Phillip Collynson A.B. who was instituted in April

1558, and who remained as rector for a long time, quite different from his

predecessors, until his death in 1578.



The new order to register all births, marriages and deaths met with opposition,

for it was feared that it was the thin edge of the wedge to bring about a new tax

system. Meetings of protest were held in many parts of the country. It was in 1559,

by which time Elizabeth I was on the throne, that the penalty for non-entry in the

registers was a fine that was divided equally between the poor of the parish and the

repair of the church.



Many parish churches still treasure their ancient coffers with two locks from

1545, but ours must have vanished many years ago. We are however most fortunate in

having a full record of entries through the years, for many other villages have lost

their registers in the early years.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [78]



Last month we arrived at our 36th recorded rector who, we assume presided over

the spiritual affairs of our village for twenty years, until his death in 1578. It is

reasonable to assume also that he lived in a rather humble parsonage. One writer

tells of the 17th century parsonage houses being so small that one is tempted to

suppose that no married clergyman could yet have lived in them. One such home

contained “two bays, a hall, and one chamber lofted over.”



Our next rector, the 37th on our list, was William Smith A.M. who was instituted

on January 26th, 1578. His patron was Queen Elizabeth I. During his term of office,

conversations of William Smith and his family could well have been of the exploits of

the Armada, and perhaps he met and talked with Sir Walter Raleigh who was a frequent

visitor to nearby Paulerspury. He may even have met Shakespeare who also visited

“Pury”. Then they would talk of Drake‟s wonderful voyage around the world taking him

three years! News too would have quickly travelled to Blisworth of the execution of

Mary Queen of Scots at Fotheringhay.



There is one puzzling feature of the records at this period – they are signed

by a Robert Howkins (Minister) who could well have been an assistant, for the rector,

William Smith, could have been an absentee parson. These early entries are also

signed by two churchwardens, John Elward and Nicholas Gibbes.



At the beginning of Elizabeth‟s reign many of the clergy had brought a wife out

of hiding, as marriage had been frowned upon by the crown prior to this time. During

the years 1590 to 1650 both parsonage houses and the yeoman farmer dwellings in our

midland stone belt were rebuilt reflecting the increasing prosperity of the land.

Some of our country parsonages were quite grand and had very fine staircases of good

Northamptonshire oak. Many examples still survive.



Our 38th recorded rector was Richard Cook A.M. Instituted in 1630 and died 1656.

The patronage had changed to Christopher Hatton Kt. Queen Elizabeth had died in 1603

and was followed by the first of the Stuart Kings, James I. My own guess, based on

shallow evidence, is that Richard Cook built for himself and family a comfortable new

rectory of the Cotswold style. This old Rectory survived until 1842 when the next

rectory was built.



Stormy times were ahead for Church and State. Civil War was in the air, and

John Keble wrote these words:-





“Is this the time to plant and build,

add house to house, and field to field,

when round our walks the battle lowers,

when mines are hid beneath our towers,

and watchful foes are stealing round

to search and spoil the holy ground?”

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [79]







In last month‟s notes we arrived at our 38th recorded rector, Richard Cook, M.A.

Before we move on to the next rector I would like to say just a little of the troubled

times of this period especially in relation to the Church.



During the civil war many clergy were treated terribly by both royalists and

puritans, according to the view held. We do not know the politics of Richard Cook,

but he certainly seems to have been very fortunate in staying “put” at Blisworth from

1630 to 1656.



Other rectors were not so lucky, for about 7000 were evicted, some being sent

to their death on the hulks. In 1643 at nearby Lois Weedon, the rector, William

Losse, was attacked by twelve soldiers as he fled to the tower for safety. He was

fired at by pistols and pierced by swords. A Norfolk rector had his doors broken down

by parliamentarian troops and his mother and six children were turned out into the

street; this was followed by a wild pillage of all his household goods and library by

the troopers . . . such was the price of civil war.



I have also made mention of the brevity of the entries of past village people

in our parish registers. We seem to know so little of their occupations and thoughts.

I am therefore, tempted to begin the notes for 1970 with the following poem by Edmund

Blunden, which seems to speak so clearly of the unknown villagers of the past.









FOREFATHERS



Here they went with smock and crook,

Toiled in the sun, lolled in the shade,

Here they muddied out the brook

And here their hatchet cleared the glade:

Harvest-supper woke their wit,

Huntsman‟s moon their wooings lit.



From this church they led their brides,

From this church themselves were led

Shoulder-high; on these waysides

Sat to take their beer and bread.

Names have gone – what men they were

These their cottages declare.



Names are vanished, save the few

In the old brown bible scrawled;

These were men of pith and thew,

Whom the city never called;

Scarce could read or hold a quill,

Built the barn, the forge, the mill.



On the green they watched their sons

Playing till to dark to see,

As their fathers watched them once,

As my father once watched me;

While the bat and beetle flew

On the warm air webbed with dew.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [80]





The first half of the seventeenth century was one of great local revival. Our

thirty-eighth recorded rector, Richard Cooke A.M. must have enjoyed his incumbency at

Blisworth from 1630 to 1656. Around him were many fine new buildings including his

own rectory. The church porch had been built in 1607; the bells had been re-hung,

some recast, and two carry the date of 1624. Fine yeoman houses appeared some dated

but others not – many have disappeared but we still have sufficient left to link us

with the days of the Rev. Richard Cooke.



Cliffe Hill barn and Farmstead were built in 1633; No. 35 Stoke Road in 1652;

No. 11 Courteenhall Road, when restored some years ago, brought to light a wall

painting dated around 1630, the words taken from psalm 143 v 10; “Teach me to do the

thing that pleaseth Thee, for Thou art my God; let Thy loving spirit lead me forth

into the land of Righteousness”.



The part of the village around the elm tree was called “Townsend”. The

prosperous yeomen were the Plowmans, Brafields, Elwards, Gibbs, Estells, etc. and

these once great families must have all attended our village church.



In 1646 the village received a charity which is recorded on a tablet in the

church. “Mrs. Leeson left to the Poor of this Parish thirty shillings a year forever

to be paid out of a farm in Abthorpe, and to be distributed by the Churchwardens and

Over-seers of the Poor, with the approbation of the Minister.” This charity is at

present given to the Evergreen Club.



The Rev. Cooke wrote his entries in a delightful clear italic handwriting.

In January 1652 he laid his wife to rest; unfortunately no ages were recorded at this

time, but we can assume that both the rector and his wife had arrived at a mature age.

His entry simply tells us that “Elizabeth the wife of Richard Cooke was buried in Jan.

1652.”



By September 1653 the rector‟s entries terminate – presumably through ill

health. In the half year preceding he had recorded four baptisms and two burials.

Our thirty-eighth rector died in 1656, and a new and untidy handwriting records his

death thus:-



“Master Richard Cooke, Parson

of Blisworth Departed the 24th

day of November 1666”



Outside the quiet realm of the village, Charles II had ascended the throne in

1660. The Great Plague had hit London in 1665, followed by the cleansing of the Great

Fire 1666. Politics were moving into a new age. Of Charles it is said: “He never

said a foolish thing, and never did a wise one”.



Next month we will move onto our thirty-ninth rector.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [81]





Last month we concluded with the burial of Master Richard Cooke our 38th

recorded rector of Blisworth, 1630-1656. I mentioned too how the Rev. R. Cooke had

evidently become too aged or ill to conduct his services, for his main entries

terminate in September 1653. Only one further entry occurs in his handwriting, this

being two years later when in 1655 he recorded “Elizabeth the daughter of Richard and

Alice Estell was borne the second day of September, and baptized the twelfth of

September 1655” (He died in 1656.)



When Richard Cooke became ill in 1653 it became necessary for a deputy to

witness and record the Births, Marriages and Deaths, etc. In October 1653 an

interesting entry was made:-



“John Cowp of Blysworth in ye County of Northampton was

acordinge to the Act of Parlament in that case provided

elected therefore by ye major part of ye parishioners

of Blysworth to be ye Parish Registrar . . .according to

ye sayd Act of Parlament . . . 1653 before me

signd John Parker”



It was not until four years after Richard Cooke‟s death that a new parson was

inducted, this was on October 15th 1660, when Robert Boreham S.T.P. became our 39th

recorded rector; Charles II ascended the throne in the same year.



Our new rector, together with many of his parishioners, would also have

witnessed (possibly to their consternation) the destruction of the town walls of

Northampton together with portions of the castle. This wholesale act of demolition

was one of revenge (or punishment) against the townsfolk for being anti-monarchists in

the late civil wars. At this time some of the village cottages were being

constructed. I wonder how many contain stones retrieved from the old castle walls.

(Man has always been ready to re-use good stones whenever the opportunity existed. It

was much easier than quarrying them.)



But Robert Boreham was not destined to stay at Blisworth for long – he resigned

the living in 1664. During his short stay the patronage changed from Christopher Lord

Hatton to that of Baron de Kirby.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [82]





Jonathan Yates, A.M., became our 40th recorded rector on March 4th, 1664. The

ever changing patronage was now in the hands of John Clement, Esq. The new rector was

soon to learn the names of his new flock . . .names which still linger on, in, and

around the local villages . . . Atkins, Rowe, Gardiner, Baylie, Pacey, and Plowman,

etc. Christian names being William, Anne, John, Richard, Alice, etc. with the

occasional not so popular Ursular for a girl, and Gamaliell for a boy.



When Jonathan Yates came to Blisworth the manor lands were in the hands of Sir

Robert Cooke, but in 1665 the property fell to the hands of the restored Charles II

who granted Blisworth and other lands to Denzil Lord Hollis, Phillip Earl

Chesterfield, and five others. Again in 1673 the manor underwent another change of

ownership, when it was given by the king to Henry Earl of Arlington, whose son in law

Henry Fitzroy, succeeded to the manor in 1675. In the same year the new lord of

Blisworth was created Duke of Grafton, and the village remained in the hands of his

descendants until 1919 when Blisworth and their other Northamptonshire properties were

sold.



Had the rector, Jonathan Yates, left behind a diary he would have told of the

great fire of Northampton which in 1675, burnt down most of the town . . . refugees

could well have come to Blisworth. He would have witnessed the quick rebuilding of

the town, much of the timber being a gift of Charles II, who by now had forgiven the

townsfolk for their civil war deeds.



At Blisworth he seems to have lived at a time of minimum hostility by either

political or religious interference, not to mention his own married bliss. He would

have watched with interest the pattern of the seasons, and the “stocking up” of the

tithe barn in the Autumn. (in 1675 the parish of Blisworth had 894½ acres of arable

land and 405 acres of pasture land.) Marriages were few – in the years 1670 - 1672 he

only conducted two weddings, but there were twenty burials and twelve baptisms.



In 1679 the Rev. Jonathan Yates lost his wife, and he recorded the fact in the

following simple form:-



“Rebekah Yates was buried the 23rd day of September”



In the chancel however, he placed a simple yet very moving memorial to his

beloved wife as follows:-



“In this pace is buried Rebechah who was the wife of my

right hand and joy fortie & foure yeares ten months and

one week

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [83]





Although I stated in last month‟s notes that our 40th recorded rector had lived

mainly through a peaceful period of history, he did however see a troublesome rising

during his last two years. The Rev. Jonathan Yates died in 1687, King Charles had

died two years previously, and James II (brother of Charles) had ascended the throne.



James in 1673 had embraced roman catholicism. Following a popish plot of 1678

a violent anti-catholic feeling ran through the country. Within six months of James‟

accession, another James, the Duke of Monmouth, one of Charles‟ illegitimate sons,

landed at Lyme, in Dorset, and was proclaimed king by the protestants at Taunton.

Later Monmouth was captured by James‟ army and was executed. Religious persecution

began on a large scale; James II became ruthless in his attempts to crush

protestantism.



In November, 1688, William of Orange landed at Brixham in Devon. Parliament

stated that James II was no longer king and James fled the country leaving a vacant

throne. In 1689 William III ascended the throne to reign for the next thirteen years.

On the accession of William and Mary a “toleration act” was passed. It was called

“The Great Charter of Dissent” by many. William was a calvanist and was impartial in

religious matters.



Thus it was that in the midst of this national turmoil our 41st recorded rector

arrived at Blisworth on December 13th, 1687. I like to picture him as a large

scholarly “A.B.”, well dressed gentleman of the period, with money too, for the

patronage had again changed hands and the new patron was Joseph Knibb, gentleman, who,

one would suppose was the father of parson George.



Probably on the first visit to our parish church parson George inspected the

ancient register, and taking up a fine quill pen wrote the following:-



“INCIPIT GEORGIUS KNIBB

LUJUS ECCLESLAE RECTOR”



Or in plain English:- “Here begins George Knibb

Rector of this Church”



Little is known otherwise of the family “Knibb” – there is only one other

reference by name to the family when in 1890, a Thomas Knibb is married to Margaret

Lowe.



The Rev. George Knibb stayed at Blisworth for fourteen years until 1701.

With George‟s departure, so too the patronage changed hands once again. I would have

liked parson George to have recorded his exit from the parish by stating in his fine

handwriting:-



“Here endeth George Knibb

once Rector of Blisworth”



but this he never did, and there the name of Knibb vanishes from our registers.



During his fourteen years at Blisworth the appointment of church wardens

frequently occurred – the old village families providing the new wardens who were John

Atkins, Frances Gibs, Richard Tew, John Pain, William Plowman, Will Estle, Edward

Brafield, John Bland, John Staughton, John Burgess, Thomas Brown and Thomas Simpkins.

The Plowman family seem to have been at the height of their prosperity, for

family members were buried within the church – an honour only bestowed on the top

members of the village society. A William Plowman was buried in the chancel in 1695

in the 69th year of his age. His now vanished monument carried this inscription:-



“STAND STILL, READER, and spend a tear,

Upon the dust that slumbers here;

And whilst thou read‟st the state of me,

Think on the glass that runs for THEE.”









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [84]





Last month we took a brief look at the coming and going of our 41st rector, the

Rev. George Knibb, 1687-1701. His burial took place on June 16th, 1701, and the

service appears to have been conducted by the curate Cornelious Hopkins, who could

well have been “in charge” until the new rector was appointed. With the death of

George Knibb, so too came yet another change in patrons, the living being purchased by

one, William Roberts, gentleman and physician, who forthwith established his son,

Roland Roberts A.M., as our 42nd recorded rector. The induction was on August 4th,

1701.



One year later this new rector would have received instructions to change the

name of the monarch in the prayer book, for King William III had been killed in a

hunting accident: the new occupant of the throne was Queen Anne. Of her husband,

Prince George of Denmark, Charles II had previously commented:- “I have tried him

drunk and tried him sober, and there is nothing in him”. Queen Anne was a staunch

high church protestant. Her creation of “Queen Anne‟s bounty” restored to the church

for the increase of the incomes of the poorer clergy, a fund raised from tithes which

Henry VIII had taken for his own use: the Queen was not in any way a clever woman, but

she was surrounded by statesmen of exceptional talent. This was indeed a brilliant

age in our history; Blenheim was won, the new St. Pauls was built, etc., but poor

Queen Anne was deprived of building up her family, for although she had seventeen

children, none survived.



Such too was the story of infant mortality in or own village. Entry after

entry in our register tells of children being baptized one day and buried on the day

following. By this time new names were appearing in the village; Dent the Miller –

Tredwell the Grazier – Inwood the Wheelwright – Macock the Butcher, etc. but the older

families still flourished – the Plowmans, Atkins, Gibbs, Brafields, etc.



Queen Anne reigned for twelve years; she died in 1714 at the age of 49. Our

rector was to live for the next seven years, during which time his new King was George

I, the first of the Hanoverians. Our rector, the Rev. Roland Roberts, died in 1721.



During his twenty years at Blisworth, either he or his curates had officiated

at approximately 110 burials, 113 baptisms and 29 marriages. From his recordings

there appear a few strange entries:-



“Thomas Nicholls of Naseby dying suddenly at Blisworth, which

being told at Naseby, a woman hearing it fell down and died.”



“Thomas Potter a stranger was buried.”



“John a child it was left in this Parish. Father and Mother

unknown.” was baptized May 17.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [85]





We have now arrived at the year 1721 and our 43rd recorded rector, who was

Samuel Green A.M. and whose visit to Blisworth was a very brief one. He was inducted

on June 26th, 1721, and resigned from the living in 1723. With his coming so too the

patronage changed, for the advowson was now in the hands of William Earl of Hatton.



Our 43rd rector could well have been a member of the illustrious family from

which Greens Norton takes its name. He was the son of a Samuel Green and a kinsman of

Robert Heskith and Jane Farmer, these two names belonging to the present family of

Fermor-Hesketh at Easton Neston. Much earlier the Green family was recorded in

relation to Blisworth, for in 1528 Emma Wake, who lived here, left in her will a

“payre of shetys” (pair of sheets) to a Sir Thomas Green.



With the resignation of Samuel Green the patronage remained unchanged for the

next four rectors.



Following the Rev. Samuel Green came Thomas Ward in 1723, who remained at

Blisworth until his death in 1762. During these years he was assisted by curates, two

of whose names were Samuel Edwards and Joseph Backhouse. Members of the ancient

Plowman family were also still much in evidence as churchwardens, together with the

Battams, Inns, Herberts, Cook, Gurney, Brafield, Gibbs and Dents.



Of the rector we know that he matriculated at the age of sixteen in 1696 and that he

was the son of Thomas Ward, Rector of Wold (now called Old). Our rector had two sons

and eight daughters, and before coming to Blisworth he was rector of Hazelbeech and

Wilby. We know little of his activities during his thirty-nine years at Blisworth,

but records show that there were approximately two hundred and thirty four burials,

two hundred and sixty four baptisms, and only thirty eight marriages during his years

1723-1762.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [86]





The Rev. Nathaniel Trotter B.D.L. became our 45th recorded rector on December

th

14 1762, 218 years ago, and he remained in office until his death at Blisworth

thirty-five years later in 1797. George III had ascended the throne in 1760 and he

remained as King for the next fifty-nine years. Our rector‟s patron was Chas. Henry

lord Hatton. The Rev. Nathaniel Trotter (how I love those names) was the son of Ralph

Trotter, gentleman, of Newbold Vernon. Before coming to Blisworth he had been a

curate at Mears Ashby and rector of Thurleston in Leicestershire. He obtained a

special dispensation to continue with the living at Thurleston, thereby making him

rector of two villages widely separated. It is evident though that he spent most of

his time at Blisworth for his signature appears regularly throughout his lifetime

here.



His rectory has long vanished, and I doubt whether he would recognize our

present village. In the middle of the 18th century there were only 65 houses, plus 6

cottages which were allocated for the poor. Of these 65 houses at least a score of

the better ones would be occupied by yeoman farmers. These men farmed the strips in

the great open fields together with only a few enclosed fields, for as yet the main

lands of the parish had not yet been enclosed. It was from these yeoman farmer

families that the rector and people of the village would select and elect their

various wardens. The rector too would have given permission for the church bell to be

rung to call the village people and jurymen to attend the annual vestry and court

leets at which all village affairs and problems were sorted out.



During his 35 years at Blisworth the rector saw great changes – new improved

communications – moving and increasing populations – new houses etc. Remember too

that as yet neither canal, railway nor turnpike had touched the village to disturb its

peace. All our byroads were simple grass tracks. He also lived to know of the Rev.

John Wesley preaching at the open air services at nearby Whittlebury – Towcester –

Weedon – Harlestone and Northampton, this was in October 1771, and these must have

been visited (perhaps secretly) by some of his own flock. Later, in 1780, the rector

was to feel the direct impact of dissent amongst his parishioners – for John Goodridge

came over from Roade to hold meetings of non-conformity. Prayer Meetings were held

regularly, and soon a dwelling house was licensed for evening preaching – thus our

village baptist church was born.

THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [87]



The Rev. Nathaniel Trotter, our rector 1762-1797, would have had a direct

interest in the village school (for boys only) to which the sons of the labourers

went. The boys of the trades people and farmers walked to the grammar school at

Courteenhall. New names begin to appear with the rising population- Carter, Gudgeon –

Whitlock – Basford – Savage – Dent – Westley – Campion – Goodridge – Judge – Johnson

etc. I feel sure too that the rector followed the increasing interest in land

husbandry of which the king was prime exponent, for he became known as Farmer George.

Our rector still held the glebe lands and annually collected his tithe from them.

There is no record that the rector had a family, but King George III and his wife

Charlotte produced fifteen children . . . and he lost us the American colonies in

1776.



During the last years of the seventeenth century the elderly Rev. Nathaniel

Trotter must have found it difficult to accept many of the changes which were heaping

up around him. A major upheaval was the knowledge of the extension of the baptist

chapel from Roade to Blisworth. Last month I mentioned how John Goodridge had come in

1780 to conduct prayer meetings; the regularity of these meetings, which received an

official licence for evening preaching, was soon to disturb our rector, who headed the

opposition party.



It is stated that he sent for those villagers who were responsible thinking to

stop their work of founding a baptist chapel. We are told too that he so far

influenced Mr. Roper, the duke of Grafton‟s agent, to get the licensed dwelling house

closed. The noble Duke, living at Wakefield Lawn, next to Potterspury (which village

he also owned) was approached by the independent minister of that village, who

appealed for toleration in relation to the baptists at Blisworth. It is generally

believed that the Duke knew nothing of the persecution – indeed he reprimanded the

Blisworth rector himself saying: “Why can‟t you let these people alone, they are some

of my best tenants; they shall have a meeting house”. In the year 1787 Mr. Robert

Campion, a village farmer, granted the use of a barn for the baptists to hold their

services.

(I wonder what both sides would have made of our present practice today of

having combined Services on Good Friday, Harvest Festival, and the Women’s World Day

of Prayer, using Chapel and Church alternately? Thank God that today we both

recognise that we are “All one in Christ Jesus” Galatians ch.3 v.28.

The Rector)

Another revolutionary change witnessed by the rector, which was to boost his

services in connection with a population increase and its subsequent, births,

marriages, and deaths, was the coming of the Grand Junction Canal. Along the natural

valley skirting the rectory and church lands ran winterbrook, which in turn fed the

mill pond (now Pondbank). In 1793 considerable numbers of “navigators” descended on

the parish working on the new cut which was to become the great navigable canal, thus

putting Blisworth on the map as a busy inland port. The rector was to live long

enough to see the wharfs at Blisworth stacked with coal at 10½d per cwt. together with

all sorts of merchandise brought by canal boats. By 1795 the road through the

villages, coupling Towcester and Far Cotton, was designated as a turnpike road. The

Blisworth toll gate was immediately fronting the parish church. Both the canal and

turnpike authorities became subject to paying a rate, which the rector and wardens

distributed for the relief of the poor of the parish. Some of the money was to go to

the wives of the Blisworth men who were taken for service in the militia for the

Napoleonic wars which began in 1793.

During the immediate following years many now familiar names made their first

appearance. Harris, Clarke, Carter, Pinfold, Whitmore, and during these years the

Rev. Nathaniel Trotter met with rich and poor, conducting services, burials, baptisms,

and marriages, assisted by a curate. It is assumed that the rector was responsible

for the following lines which occur in the register:-



“How few exceed the Boundary of Fame

Known to the world by something more than Name!

This tells us when They‟re born, and when they Die

What more? Why this is all their History.

Enough if virtue filled the space between

Prov‟d by the ends of Being, to have Been.”



In the register too is the simple entry by a new hand, thus:-



„The Revd. Nathaniel Trotter

Rector of this Parish died

Feb. 15 1797”

There is no mention of burial. Does this mean that his body was buried elsewhere?

Of the other fifteen recorded village deaths for 1797 all are recorded as “buried”.









THE HISTORY OF YOUR PARISH CHURCH [88]



The Rev. John Ambrose, Rector 1797 - 1839









The above shows our parish church as it looked at the time of the arrival of

our 46th recorded rector, the Rev. John Ambrose B.A. who was inducted on April 19th,

1797. Note the absence of the present steep pitched roof; note also the belfry

doorway and the weathervane on the tower, etc. Inside he would have found box pews

and a musician‟s gallery, with much dark paintwork on the pillars and most certainly

no form of heating. He was assisted in his services by a curate, Edward Gillespy, and

a sexton who was also the parish clerk.



Whatever the new rector thought of his new parish being torn asunder by the

construction of the canal, he then little knew that he was to remain at Blisworth to

witness one of the greatest of the last century‟s developments – the London to

Birmingham railway, which was to cross his parish in 1837-38.



His first wedding was between William Cook and Elizabeth Reeves; William was

able to sign his name, but not so for poor Elizabeth, she could only manage “her mark

. . X” From the earliest of times it was not considered necessary to teach girls to

read and write, but the boys of the village were more fortunate for they had the

choice of either the Wake endowed school or the Courteenhall grammar school.



For at least the next two months we shall take a look at the vast changes which

were to keep the Rev. John Ambrose fully occupied during his 42 years at Blisworth.